Literature DB >> 10831713

MR imaging and cardiac pacemakers: in-vitro evaluation and in-vivo studies in 51 patients at 0.5 T.

T Sommer1, C Vahlhaus, G Lauck, A von Smekal, M Reinke, U Hofer, W Block, F Träber, C Schneider, J Gieseke, W Jung, H Schild.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at 0.5 T in patients with implanted cardiac pacemakers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one models of pacemakers and 44 pacemaker electrodes were exposed to in vitro MR imaging with continuous registration of pacemaker output and temperature at the lead tip. Prior to MR imaging examination, pacemakers were programmed to an asynchronous mode (A00, V00, or D00). Pacemakers were examined before and after MR imaging. Forty-four patients with implanted pacemakers underwent 51 MR imaging examinations under cardiologic surveillance, continuous electrocardiography, pulse oximetry, and capnographic monitoring.
RESULTS: MR imaging was safely performed in all patients. None of the pacemakers displayed a pacing dysfunction at MR imaging. No changes occurred in the programmed parameters in any device tested in vivo or in vitro. Maximum increases in the temperature at the lead tips were 8.90 degrees C at a specific absorption rate (SAR) of 0.6 W/kg and 23.50 degrees C under a worst-case radio-frequency (RF) heating condition with an SAR of 1.3 W/kg.
CONCLUSION: MR imaging at 0.5 T can be safely performed in patients with implanted pacemakers in carefully selected clinical circumstances when appropriate strategies (programming to an asynchronous mode, adequate monitoring techniques, limited RF exposure) are used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10831713     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.215.3.r00jn08869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  34 in total

1.  Modern pacemaker and implantable cardioverter/defibrillator systems can be magnetic resonance imaging safe: in vitro and in vivo assessment of safety and function at 1.5 T.

Authors:  Ariel Roguin; Menekhem M Zviman; Glenn R Meininger; E Rene Rodrigues; Timm M Dickfeld; David A Bluemke; Albert Lardo; Ronald D Berger; Hugh Calkins; Henry R Halperin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-07-26       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging, pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: current situation and clinical perspective.

Authors:  M J W Götte; I K Rüssel; G J de Roest; T Germans; R F Veldkamp; P Knaapen; C P Allaart; A C van Rossum
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 4.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Safety of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with cardiovascular implants and devices.

Authors:  S K Prasad; D J Pennell
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Compatibility of temporary pacemaker myocardial pacing leads with magnetic resonance imaging: an ex vivo tissue study.

Authors:  Alexander Pfeil; Stefanie Drobnik; Reinhard Rzanny; Anas Aboud; Joachim Böttcher; Peter Schmidt; Christian Ortmann; Gita Mall; Khosro Hekmat; Bernhard Brehm; Juergen Reichenbach; Thomas E Mayer; Gunter Wolf; Andreas Hansch
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a single-center prospective study.

Authors:  Mrinal Yadava; Matthew Nugent; Angela Krebsbach; Jessica Minnier; Peter Jessel; Charles A Henrikson
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-07-22       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 8.  Safety of implanted cardiac devices in an MRI environment.

Authors:  Esra Gucuk Ipek; Saman Nazarian
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Cardiac troponin T in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices undergoing magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  John V Higgins; Robert E Watson; Allan S Jaffe; Connie Dalzell; Nancy Acker; Joel P Felmlee; Samuel J Asirvatham; Yong-Mei Cha; Paul A Friedman; Suraj Kapa
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.900

10.  Computed tomography continues to be the preferred tomographic imaging technology for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices despite a potential risk of electrical interference by irradiation.

Authors:  Takumi Yamada
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.