Literature DB >> 11060872

Electromagnetic interference of an implantable loop recorder by commonly encountered electronic devices.

C C de Cock1, H J Spruijt, L M van Campen, A W Plu, C A Visser.   

Abstract

Electromagnetic interference of pacemaker systems has been well established and can lead to an inappropriate function of these devices. Recently, an implantable loop recorder (ILR) (REVEAL, Medtronic Inc.) has been introduced to evaluate the possible arrhythmic etiology of patients with recurrent syncope. We evaluated the interference of this device in two patients with implantable ILR and in three nonimplanted ILRs with four electromagnetic sources: cellular phones (GSMs), electronic article surveillance systems (EASs), metal detector gates (MDGs), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The GSM did not affect appropriate function of the ILR whereas radiofrequency (RF) EAS could interfere with normal function in implanted and nonimplanted systems. The MDG had no influence on ILR function. The magnetic field induced by the MRI resulted in an irreversible error in one nonimplanted ILR. Therefore, although interference between electromagnetic sources and ILRs appears to be rare in our study, physicians should be aware of possible malfunctioning of these devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11060872     DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2000.01516.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  11 in total

1.  Interference by cellular telephone with an implantable loop recorder.

Authors:  Alexandre Trigano; Olivier Blandeau; Samuel Levy
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Safe scanning, but frequent artifacts mimicking bradycardia and tachycardia during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with an implantable loop recorder (ILR).

Authors:  J Rod Gimbel; Jamal Zarghami; Christian Machado; Bruce L Wilkoff
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Electromagnetic interference in patients with implanted cardioverter-defibrillators and implantable loop recorders.

Authors:  Marcos de Sousa; Gunnar Klein; Thomas Korte; Michael Niehaus
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2002-07-01

4.  The implantable loop recorder: a tool that is "here to stay".

Authors:  Carel C Cock
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2002-01-01

5.  Artefact mimicking tachycardia during magnetic resonance imaging in a patient with an implantable loop recorder.

Authors:  J R Gimbel; B L Wilkoff
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Subcutaneous electrocardiogram monitors and their field of view.

Authors:  Robert Arzbaecher; David R Hampton; Martin C Burke; Michael C Garrett
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 1.438

7.  A media player causes clinically significant telemetry interference with implantable loop recorders.

Authors:  Jay P Thaker; Mehul B Patel; Ashok J Shah; Valdis V Liepa; Krit Jongnarangsin; Ranjan K Thakur
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 1.900

8.  Asystole detected by implantable loop recorders: true or false?

Authors:  Hussam Ali; Antonio Sorgente; Elisabetta Daleffe; Riccardo Cappato
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 1.468

9.  Use of implantable loop recorders to unravel the cause of unexplained syncope.

Authors:  Aniket Puri; Rohit Kumar Srivastava
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2013-03-07

10.  Inappropriate asystole detection in early postoperative phase after loop recorder implantation.

Authors:  Miriam Bortnik; Eraldo Occhetta; Andrea Magnani; Anna Degiovanni; Paolo Marino
Journal:  ISRN Cardiol       Date:  2011-04-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.