Literature DB >> 14624901

Surgical treatment of renal neoplasia: evolving toward a laparoscopic standard of care.

Sam B Bhayani1, Ralph V Clayman, Chandru P Sundaram, Jaime Landman, Gerald Andriole, R Sherburne Figenshau, Arnold Bullock, Steven Brandes, Arieh Shalhav, Elspeth McDougall, Adam S Kibel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the extent to which laparoscopy has replaced open surgery for renal malignancy.
METHODS: The records of all 537 patients at Washington University who underwent surgery for localized renal malignancies from January 1997 to December 2001 were examined for clinical and pathologic information.
RESULTS: The total procedures per year increased from 1997 to 2001, but the distribution of pathologic stages throughout the 5 years was similar. In 1997, laparoscopic approaches were used in 15% of cases; this increased to 65% by 2001. Nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) was used in 31% to 42% of patients yearly, but laparoscopic NSS increased in frequency. By 2001, only 3.3% of T1 tumors were removed by open radical nephrectomy compared with 55% treated by laparoscopic nephrectomy. The rest of the T1 tumors in 2001 were treated by open partial nephrectomy (20.2%) or laparoscopic NSS (21.3%). In 2001, 61% of T2 lesions were treated laparoscopically, an increase from 37% in 1997. Most open radical nephrectomies in 2001 were performed for T3 disease. The number of surgeons performing laparoscopic renal surgery has increased at our institution, from two in 1997, both endourologists, to eight in 2001, representing the entire urology faculty that treats renal cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy has replaced open radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal neoplasia. Although laparoscopic NSS is increasing in frequency, it has not yet replaced open partial nephrectomy. At our institution, the laparoscopic approach has become the standard of care when radical nephrectomy is needed for T1 or T2 renal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14624901     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(03)00670-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  6 in total

1.  Three-Dimensional (3D) Vision: Does It Improve Laparoscopic Skills? An Assessment of a 3D Head-Mounted Visualization System.

Authors:  Sam B Bhayani; Gerald L Andriole
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

2.  Optimal surgical management of the obese man with prostate cancer: laparoscopic or perineal radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Stephen J Freedland; Alan W Partin
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

3.  Surgeon characteristics and long-term trends in the adoption of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.

Authors:  Christopher P Filson; Mousumi Banerjee; J Stuart Wolf; Zaojun Ye; John T Wei; David C Miller
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 4.  Robotic surgery in urologic oncology: gathering the evidence.

Authors:  Ted A Skolarus; Yun Zhang; Brent K Hollenbeck
Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.217

5.  Diffusion of surgical innovation among patients with kidney cancer.

Authors:  David C Miller; Christopher S Saigal; Mousumi Banerjee; Jan Hanley; Mark S Litwin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique, oncologic efficacy, and safety.

Authors:  William K Johnston; J Stuart Wolf
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.862

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.