Literature DB >> 15613161

Robotic surgery in urology: fact or fantasy?

Jochen Binder1, Ronald Bräutigam, Dietger Jonas, Wassilios Bentas.   

Abstract

Advanced robotic surgery was first introduced into urology in 2000. The first studies showed the feasibility and safety of the daVinci (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) telemanipulator assistance in radical prostatectomy, pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction, and radical cystectomy and neobladder formation. The miniature endowristed tools offer a potential advantage over standard laparoscopy in the accuracy of preparation and suturing. Other features are a three-dimensional vision system and unimpaired hand-eye coordination. Complex laparoscopic tasks are learned faster by using the robot, which may also explain the shorter training required for radical prostatectomy than for manual laparoscopy. This new and expensive technology has spread rapidly over the last 4 years. By 2004, approximately 10% of radical prostatectomies in the USA will be robot-assisted. Data on the functional and oncological outcomes are accruing but not yet conclusive. There will be a further spread of robotic surgery, routine telesurgery, smaller and more affordable systems, the introduction of virtual reality, all developments which have the potential to urological surgeons to improve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15613161     DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2004.05130.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  19 in total

1.  Three-Dimensional (3D) Vision: Does It Improve Laparoscopic Skills? An Assessment of a 3D Head-Mounted Visualization System.

Authors:  Sam B Bhayani; Gerald L Andriole
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

2.  Robotic radical prostatectomy in Australia: initial experience.

Authors:  P J O'Malley; S Van Appledorn; D M Bouchier-Hayes; H Crowe; A J Costello
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  [Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy].

Authors:  A Mottrie; P Schatteman; E Fonteyne; J Rotering; M Stöckle; S Siemer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Learning curve assessment of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open-surgery controls from the premier perspective database.

Authors:  John W Davis; Usha S Kreaden; Jessica Gabbert; Raju Thomas
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  First case series of robotic radical cystoprostatectomy, bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy, and urinary diversion with the da Vinci S system.

Authors:  Ashok K Hemal; Surendra B Kolla; Pankaj Wadhwa
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2008-03-06

6.  Adverse effects of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open retropubic radical prostatectomy among a nationwide random sample of medicare-age men.

Authors:  Michael J Barry; Patricia M Gallagher; Jonathan S Skinner; Floyd J Fowler
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Web-connected surgery: using the internet for teaching and proctoring of live robotic surgeries.

Authors:  John Lenihan; Melissa Brower
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-08-25

Review 8.  Near-infrared fluorescence imaging with intraoperative administration of indocyanine green for robotic partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Marc A Bjurlin; Tyler R McClintock; Michael D Stifelman
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 9.  Applications of robotics for laryngeal surgery.

Authors:  Alexander T Hillel; Ankur Kapoor; Nabil Simaan; Russell H Taylor; Paul Flint
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.346

10.  Comparative analysis of early perioperative outcomes following radical cystectomy by either the robotic or open method.

Authors:  Anton Galich; Samuel Sterrett; Tanya Nazemi; Garrett Pohlman; Lynette Smith; K C Balaji
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2006 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.