Literature DB >> 29388161

Modified end-to-side double-layer open pancreaticogastrostomy after Whipple procedure: surgical tips for a safe anastomosis.

Raffaele Dalla Valle1, Matteo Rossini1, Laura Lamecchi1, Maurizio Iaria2.   

Abstract

Pancreatic fistula (PF) remains the Achilles' heel of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) appears to be associated with a lower risk of postoperative leak according to recent evidence. We started to fashion PG, especially in soft pancreas, modifying the original technique described by Bassi. At our institution, 105 PD procedures were carried out from January 2011 to December 2016; pancreatic-enteric continuity was restored by PG in 35 cases. Superior mesenteric/portal vein resection/reconstruction was necessary in three patients. A total of 34/35 patients underwent PG with an open anterior gastrostomy approach. Briefly, our double-layer PG anastomosis (illustrated by a video) starts with a posterior row of interrupted absorbable 4/0 monofilament sutures including the gastric serosa and the pancreatic capsule. It is essential to mobilize the left pancreas for 4-5 cm and to shape the posterior gastrostomy shorter than the pancreatic stump. After a wide anterior auxiliary gastrostomy the pancreas is invaginated into the stomach and an interrupted row of sutures between the posterior gastric wall (full-thickness) and the body of the pancreatic stump is fashioned. The anterior gastrostomy is closed with an absorbable running suture. Finally, a further layer of sutures is applied over the posterior suture line between the gastric serosa and the pancreatic capsule. The 90-day postoperative mortality was nihil. No biliary leakage was detected and the overall PF rate was 11.4% (4/35) according to the ISGPF study group. Only one patient suffered a grade B PF (in this case, PG was carried out only through a posterior gastrostomy), whereas three patients had a minor (grade A) PF. Our modified PG proved to be safe and easy to perform, while it carried excellent outcomes even in the setting of soft pancreas. Despite the limited number of cases, such modified PG appears promising, particularly for pancreatic remnants at higher risk of PF.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pancreatic fistula; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Pancreaticogastrostomy; Soft pancreas

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29388161     DOI: 10.1007/s13304-018-0513-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  12 in total

Review 1.  Techniques for prevention of pancreatic leak after pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Hans F Schoellhammer; Yuman Fong; Singh Gagandeep
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 2.  Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Christos Dervenis; Giovanni Butturini; Abe Fingerhut; Charles Yeo; Jakob Izbicki; John Neoptolemos; Michael Sarr; William Traverso; Marcus Buchler
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 3.  Pancreaticojejunostomy is comparable to pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Stefano Crippa; Roberto Cirocchi; Justus Randolph; Stefano Partelli; Giulio Belfiori; Alessandra Piccioli; Amilcare Parisi; Massimo Falconi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 4.  Meta-analysis of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  J J Xiong; C L Tan; P Szatmary; W Huang; N W Ke; W M Hu; Q M Nunes; R Sutton; X B Liu
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Open pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a pilot study.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Giovanni Butturini; Roberto Salvia; Stefano Crippa; Massimo Falconi; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Can early serum lipase measurement be routinely implemented to rule out clinically significant pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy?

Authors:  Raffaele Dalla Valle; Mario De Bellis; Giuseppe Pedrazzi; Laura Lamecchi; Giorgio Bianchi; Carlo Pellegrino; Maurizio Iaria
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 6.071

Review 7.  Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction for the prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Yao Cheng; Marta Briarava; Mingliang Lai; Xiaomei Wang; Bing Tu; Nansheng Cheng; Jianping Gong; Yuhong Yuan; Pierluigi Pilati; Simone Mocellin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-09-12

8.  Pancreaticogastrostomy is superior to pancreaticojejunostomy for prevention of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Benjamin Menahem; Lydia Guittet; Andrea Mulliri; Arnaud Alves; Jean Lubrano
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre randomised trial.

Authors:  Baki Topal; Steffen Fieuws; Raymond Aerts; Joseph Weerts; Tom Feryn; Geert Roeyen; Claude Bertrand; Catherine Hubert; Marc Janssens; Jean Closset
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 41.316

10.  Pancreatogastrostomy Versus Pancreatojejunostomy for RECOnstruction After PANCreatoduodenectomy (RECOPANC, DRKS 00000767): Perioperative and Long-term Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Tobias Keck; U F Wellner; M Bahra; F Klein; O Sick; M Niedergethmann; T J Wilhelm; S A Farkas; T Börner; C Bruns; A Kleespies; J Kleeff; A L Mihaljevic; W Uhl; A Chromik; V Fendrich; K Heeger; W Padberg; A Hecker; U P Neumann; K Junge; J C Kalff; T R Glowka; J Werner; P Knebel; P Piso; M Mayr; J Izbicki; Y Vashist; P Bronsert; T Bruckner; R Limprecht; M K Diener; I Rossion; I Wegener; U T Hopt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.