Literature DB >> 17667507

Amylase value in drains after pancreatic resection as predictive factor of postoperative pancreatic fistula: results of a prospective study in 137 patients.

Enrico Molinari1, Claudio Bassi, Roberto Salvia, Giovanni Butturini, Stefano Crippa, Giorgio Talamini, Massimo Falconi, Paolo Pederzoli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The correlation of the amylase value in drains (AVD) with the development of pancreatic fistula (PF) is still unclear. AIM: The purpose of this study was to identify within the first postoperative day (POD1) the predictive role of different risks factors, including AVD, in the development of PF. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively investigated 137 patients who underwent major pancreatic resections. PF was defined and graded in accordance with the International Study Group on PF.
RESULTS: We considered 101 pancreaticoduodenectomies and 36 distal resections. The overall incidence of PF (A, B, and C grades) was 19.7% and it was 14.8% after pancreaticoduodenectomy and 33.3% after distal resection. All PF occurred in "soft" remnant pancreas. The PF developed in patients with a POD1 median AVD of 10,000 U/L, whereas patients without PF had a median AVD of 1222 U/L (P < 0.001). We established a cut-off of 5000 U/L POD1 AVD for univariate and multivariate analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.922 (P < 0.001). The predicting risk factors selected in the univariate setting were "soft" pancreas (P = 0.005; odds ratio [OR]: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.32-1.79) and AVD (P < 0.001; OR: 5.66; 95% CI: 3.6-8.7; positive predictive value 59%; negative predictive value 98%), whereas in multivariate analysis the predicting risk factor was the POD1 AVD (P < 0.001; OR: 68.4; 95% CI: 14.8-315). Only 2 PFs were detected with AVD <5000 U/L and both were in pancreatogastric anastomosis (P = 0.053).
CONCLUSIONS: AVD in POD1 > or =5000 U/L is the only significant predictive factor of PF development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17667507      PMCID: PMC1933557          DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3180caa42f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  30 in total

1.  Management of complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy in a high volume centre: results on 150 consecutive patients.

Authors:  C Bassi; M Falconi; R Salvia; G Mascetta; E Molinari; P Pederzoli
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.588

2.  Pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resection.

Authors:  M W Büchler; H Friess; M Wagner; C Kulli; V Wagener; K Z'Graggen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Duct-to-mucosa versus end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Massimo Falconi; Enrico Molinari; William Mantovani; Giovanni Butturini; Andrew A Gumbs; Roberto Salvia; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatic resection. The importance of definitions.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Giovanni Butturini; Enrico Molinari; Giuseppe Mascetta; Roberto Salvia; Massimo Falconi; Andrew Gumbs; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2003-12-30       Impact factor: 2.588

5.  Prediction of pancreatic fistula by amylase levels of drainage fluid on the first day after pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Masahiko Yamaguchi; Hiroshi Nakano; Takemasa Midorikawa; Yasuo Yoshizawa; Yutaka Sanada; Kaoru Kumada
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug

6.  Pancreatic juice output and amylase level in the drainage fluid after pancreatoduodenectomy in relation to leakage.

Authors:  Naoki Hashimoto; Harumasa Ohyanagi
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr

7.  Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume.

Authors:  D J Gouma; R C van Geenen; T M van Gulik; R J de Haan; L T de Wit; O R Busch; H Obertop
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Does drainage fluid amylase reflect pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy?

Authors:  Yi-Ming Shyr; Cheng-Hsi Su; Chew-Wun Wu; Wing-Yiu Lui
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-04-28       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Distal pancreatectomy: does the method of closure influence fistula formation?

Authors:  Maureen K Sheehan; Kimberly Beck; Steve Creech; Jack Pickleman; Gerard V Aranha
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 0.688

10.  Risk factors for complications after pancreatic head resection.

Authors:  Ulrich Adam; Frank Makowiec; Hartwig Riediger; Wolfgang D Schareck; Stefan Benz; Ulrich T Hopt
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  86 in total

1.  Drain data to predict clinically relevant pancreatic fistula.

Authors:  Daniel J Moskovic; Sally E Hodges; Meng-Fen Wu; F Charles Brunicardi; Susan G Hilsenbeck; William E Fisher
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Abdominal Drainage and Amylase Measurement for Detection of Leakage After Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Judith P M Schots; Misha D P Luyer; Grard A P Nieuwenhuijzen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Value of scintigraphy for assessing delayed gastric emptying after pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Gan van Samkar; Wietse J Eshuis; Marike Lemmers; Dirk J Gouma; Roel J Bennink; Markus W Hollmann; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Olivier R C Busch
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  A grading system can predict clinical and economic outcomes of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: results in 755 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Despoina Daskalaki; Giovanni Butturini; Enrico Molinari; Stefano Crippa; Paolo Pederzoli; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Evolving the Paradigm of Early Drain Removal Following Pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Thomas F Seykora; Laura Maggino; Giuseppe Malleo; Major K Lee; Robert Roses; Roberto Salvia; Claudio Bassi; Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Preoperative body mass index-to-prognostic nutritional index ratio predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Norihiro Sato; Toshihisa Tamura; Noritaka Minagawa; Keiji Hirata
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 7.293

7.  Drain amylase value as an early predictor of pancreatic fistula after cephalic duodenopancreatectomy.

Authors:  Vladimir D Dugalic; Djordje M Knezevic; Vladan N Obradovic; Miroslava G Gojnic-Dugalic; Slavko V Matic; Aleksandra R Pavlovic-Markovic; Predrag D Dugalic; Srbislav M Knezevic
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Polyester Preserves the Highest Breaking Point After Prolonged Incubation in Pancreatic Juice.

Authors:  Stefano Andrianello; Giovanni Marchegiani; Biagio Anselmi; Erica Secchettin; Fabrizio Boriero; Giuseppe Malleo; Roberto Salvia; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Risk factors, clinical predictors, and management (single center experience).

Authors:  Ayman El Nakeeb; Tarek Salah; Ahmad Sultan; Mohamed El Hemaly; Waleed Askr; Helmy Ezzat; Emad Hamdy; Ehab Atef; Ehab El Hanafy; Ahmed El-Geidie; Mohamed Abdel Wahab; Talaat Abdallah
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  How do we predict the clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy?--an analysis in 244 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Manabu Kawai; Masaji Tani; Seiko Hirono; Shinomi Ina; Motoki Miyazawa; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.