Literature DB >> 16983520

Impact of physician performing embryo transfer on pregnancy rates in an assisted reproductive program.

Antonio Angelini1, Gian Francesco Brusco, Nicoletta Barnocchi, Imam El-Danasouri, Arianna Pacchiarotti, Helmy A Selman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of the individual physician performing embryo transfer, on clinical pregnancy rates.
METHOD: Data from a total of 485 consecutive embryo transfers performed on 485 women aged 23-37 years were prospectively collected for this study. All patients underwent a standard downregulation long protocol for ovarian stimulation. Oocyte recovery was performed at 36 h after hCG administration. Embryo transfer took place at 48 h after insemination. The patients were matched in two groups that have been linked to two different ET providers (A and B). The same method of loading embryos into the embryo transfer catheter was used.
RESULTS: Clinical pregnancy rates varied significantly (p< or =0.01) between the two providers: 36.1% in group A and 20.6% in group B. The number and quality of embryos transferred did not differ between the groups.
CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the physician factor may be an important variable in embryo transfer technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16983520     DOI: 10.1007/s10815-006-9032-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  12 in total

1.  The effect of a difficult embryo transfer on the outcome of IVF.

Authors:  A Lass; N Abusheikha; P Brinsden; G T Kovacs
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 2.  Embryo transfer: techniques and variables affecting success.

Authors:  W B Schoolcraft; E S Surrey; D K Gardner
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  The probability of pregnancy after embryo transfer is affected by the age of the patient, cause of infertility, number of embryos transferred and the average morphology score, as revealed by multiple logistic regression analysis.

Authors:  T J Roseboom; J P Vermeiden; E Schoute; J W Lens; R Schats
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Multiple attempts at embryo transfer: effect on pregnancy outcome in an in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program.

Authors:  D S Visser; F L Fourie; H F Kruger
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  Clinical approaches to increasing uterine receptivity during human implantation.

Authors:  R G Edwards
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Pregnancy rates after embryo transfer depend on the provider at embryo transfer.

Authors:  R M Hearns-Stokes; B T Miller; L Scott; D Creuss; P K Chakraborty; J H Segars
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Bacteria in the transfer catheter tip influence the live-birth rate after in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  D E Moore; M R Soules; N A Klein; V Y Fujimoto; K J Agnew; D A Eschenbach
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Ongoing pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization are not dependent on the physician performing the embryo transfer.

Authors:  Hans G I van Weering; Roel Schats; Joseph McDonnell; Peter G A Hompes
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Dummy embryo transfer using methylene blue dye.

Authors:  R T Mansour; M A Aboulghar; G I Serour; Y M Amin
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Embryo morphology, developmental rates, and maternal age are correlated with chromosome abnormalities.

Authors:  S Munné; M Alikani; G Tomkin; J Grifo; J Cohen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  6 in total

1.  Examination of bacterial contamination at the time of embryo transfer, and its impact on the IVF/pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  Helmy Selman; Monica Mariani; Nicoletta Barnocchi; Antonella Mencacci; Francesco Bistoni; Saverio Arena; Silvana Pizzasegale; Gian Francesco Brusco; Antonio Angelini
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Effects of embryo transfer quality on pregnancy and live birth delivery rates.

Authors:  Dietmar Spitzer; R Haidbauer; C Corn; J Stadler; B Wirleitner; N H Zech
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  The impact of the depth of embryo replacement on IVF outcome.

Authors:  Arianna Pacchiarotti; Mohamed A Mohamed; Giulietta Micara; Daniela Tranquilli; Antonella Linari; Salomè M B Espinola; Cesare Aragona
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  National Survey Highlights the Urgent Need for Standardisation of Embryo Transfer Techniques in the UK.

Authors:  Lewis Nancarrow; Nicola Tempest; Andrew J Drakeley; Roy Homburg; Richard Russell; Dharani K Hapangama
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Infertility-related stress, anxiety and ovarian stimulation: can couples be reassured about the effects of psychological factors on biological responses to assisted reproductive technology?

Authors:  Zaira Donarelli; Gianluca Lo Coco; Salvatore Gullo; Angelo Marino; Aldo Volpes; Laura Salerno; Adolfo Allegra
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Soc Online       Date:  2016-11-05

6.  COMFFETI, Combined Fresh and Frozen Embryo Transfers per Individual: A New Index of Quality Control for The Performance of emberyologic Labs in The Emerging Era of Segmentation of Cycle and Freeze-All Strategy.

Authors:  Evangelos G Papanikolaou; Evi Timotheou; Petroula Tatsi; Hieronymus Janssens; Michael Grynberg; Apostolos Athanasiadis; Christina Zafeirati; Robert Najdecki; Stamatios Petousis
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2018-10-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.