Literature DB >> 22116647

Effects of embryo transfer quality on pregnancy and live birth delivery rates.

Dietmar Spitzer1, R Haidbauer, C Corn, J Stadler, B Wirleitner, N H Zech.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To analyze the effects of embryo transfer (ET) quality on clinical pregnancy (CPR) and live birth delivery rates (LBDR).
METHODS: In a retrospective study at a single, private infertility center between November 2005 and December 2009 one thousand fifty-five day-3 and day-5 ETs following IVF/ICSI/IMSI were evaluated. We analyzed the impact of an atraumatic ET with a soft catheter (ET 1), after external guidance (ET 2), after probing of the cervix with a stylet (ET 3), or after grasping the portio vaginalis with a tenaculum (ET 4) on CPR and LBDR.
RESULTS: The use of external guidance showed a significantly reduced LBDR as compared to an atraumatic ET (26.0% vs. 32.5%). The lowest CPR and LBDR were found in ET 4. The application of stylets in cases of difficult ETs was superior to the use of external guidance. No differences in miscarriages between ET 1-4 were noted.
CONCLUSIONS: Besides embryo culture and patient history, the quality of an ET might also have an important impact on pregnancy outcome. Techniques to ensure an atraumatic ET, such as mechanic uterine cavity length measurements, before starting treatment might help identify patients at risk for a difficult ET and lead to modified treatments, such as the primary use of a stylet. Limitation of study: retrospective analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22116647      PMCID: PMC3270140          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-011-9680-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  17 in total

Review 1.  What factors are important for successful embryo transfer after in-vitro fertilization?

Authors:  G T Kovacs
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 2.  Optimizing the technique of embryo transfer.

Authors:  Lindsay Mains; Bradley J Van Voorhis
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Prospective evaluation of the optimal time for selecting a single embryo for transfer: day 3 versus day 5.

Authors:  Nicolas H Zech; Bernard Lejeune; Francoise Puissant; Sabine Vanderzwalmen; Herbert Zech; Pierre Vanderzwalmen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Impact of physician performing embryo transfer on pregnancy rates in an assisted reproductive program.

Authors:  Antonio Angelini; Gian Francesco Brusco; Nicoletta Barnocchi; Imam El-Danasouri; Arianna Pacchiarotti; Helmy A Selman
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-09-17       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Junctional zone contractions and embryo transfer: is it safe to use a tenaculum?

Authors:  P Lesny; S R Killick; J Robinson; G Raven; S D Maguiness
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  A prospective randomized trial of blastocyst culture and transfer in in-vitro fertilization.

Authors:  D K Gardner; W B Schoolcraft; L Wagley; T Schlenker; J Stevens; J Hesla
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Difficult or repeated sequential embryo transfers do not adversely affect in-vitro fertilization pregnancy rates or outcome.

Authors:  I Tur-Kaspa; Y Yuval; D Bider; J Levron; A Shulman; J Dor
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  In vitro fertilization with single blastocyst-stage versus single cleavage-stage embryos.

Authors:  Evangelos G Papanikolaou; Michel Camus; Efstratios M Kolibianakis; Lisbet Van Landuyt; Andre Van Steirteghem; Paul Devroey
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Uterine contractions at the time of embryo transfer alter pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization.

Authors:  R Fanchin; C Righini; F Olivennes; S Taylor; D de Ziegler; R Frydman
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  A randomized controlled clinical trial of 2295 ultrasound-guided embryo transfers.

Authors:  Andrew J Drakeley; Andrea Jorgensen; John Sklavounos; Thomas Aust; Rafet Gazvani; Paula Williamson; Charles R Kingsland
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  4 in total

1.  Effect of the afterloaded external guidance embryo transfer technique on pregnancy rates in single embryo transfer cycles.

Authors:  Nafiye Yılmaz; Ayla Sargın Oruç; Tugba Zeyrek; Umit Görkem; Hasan Ali Inal; Yaprak Engin-Üstün; Cavidan Gülerman
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2013-09-01

2.  Intrauterine administration of human chorionic gonadotropin does not improve pregnancy and life birth rates independently of blastocyst quality: a randomised prospective study.

Authors:  Barbara Wirleitner; Maximilian Schuff; Pierre Vanderzwalmen; Astrid Stecher; Jasmin Okhowat; Libor Hradecký; Tomáš Kohoutek; Milena Králícková; Dietmar Spitzer; Nicolas H Zech
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 5.211

3.  The effect of embryo transfer technique on pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Zeynep Öztürk İnal; Hasan Ali İnal
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-03-12

4.  Evaluation of a strategy for difficult embryo transfers from a prospective series of 2,046 transfers.

Authors:  Lionel Larue; Laure Bernard; Julie Moulin; Anne Massari; Nino-Guy Cassuto; Dominique Bouret; Gwenola Keromnes
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2020-12-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.