Literature DB >> 15705368

Ongoing pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization are not dependent on the physician performing the embryo transfer.

Hans G I van Weering1, Roel Schats, Joseph McDonnell, Peter G A Hompes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the influence of the factor of the physician performing the ET with a standardized procedure on the ongoing pregnancy rates in an IVF-ET program.
DESIGN: Prospective observational study.
SETTING: Tertiary university hospital. PATIENT(S): Subfertile women with an IVF indication. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Ongoing pregnancy. RESULT(S): Six physicians performed 977 ETs. Ongoing pregnancy rates ranged from 19.1% to 29.0%, with an average rate of 23.1%. Logistic regression analysis revealed that physician is not a statistically significant variable. Differences between the pregnancy rates achieved by the physicians are within the limits of random variation. CONCLUSION(S): The probability of success in IVF is not dependent on the physician, provided the transfer procedure is standardized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15705368     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.07.957

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  4 in total

1.  Should a patient's own IVF physician perform the embryo transfer?

Authors:  Stephanie J Estes; Stacey A Missmer; Elizabeth S Ginsburg
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Impact of physician performing embryo transfer on pregnancy rates in an assisted reproductive program.

Authors:  Antonio Angelini; Gian Francesco Brusco; Nicoletta Barnocchi; Imam El-Danasouri; Arianna Pacchiarotti; Helmy A Selman
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-09-17       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Is the clinician an independent variable in embryo transfer outcomes under standardized direct and indirect supervision? A 5-year observational cohort study.

Authors:  Monica Mittal; Prasanna Raj Supramaniam; Lee Nai Lim; Haitham Hamoda; Mike Savvas; Nitish Narvekar
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2019-02-15

4.  The human factor: does the operator performing the embryo transfer significantly impact the cycle outcome?

Authors:  F Cirillo; P Patrizio; M Baccini; E Morenghi; C Ronchetti; L Cafaro; E Zannoni; A Baggiani; P E Levi-Setti
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-02-29       Impact factor: 6.918

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.