Literature DB >> 2671035

Cytobrush in collection of cervical specimens for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

J Moncada1, J Schachter, M Shipp, G Bolan, J Wilber.   

Abstract

Methods of collecting endocervical samples for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis were evaluated. We compared Calgiswab and cytobrush for isolation in cell culture and Dacron swab and cytobrush for direct fluorescent-antibody (DFA) testing for 632 females attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic. An additional specimen for enzyme immunoassay (EIA) was also collected. True-positives were identified as tissue culture positive and/or both DFA and EIA positive. Use of the cytobrush significantly improved the sensitivity of both the culture (69% with swab and 100% with cytobrush) and DFA testing (68% with swab and 85% with cytobrush). The EIA sensitivity was 85%. The specificity of each test was greater than or equal to 98%. The cytobrush appears to be the superior method for the collection of cervical samples from nonpregnant women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2671035      PMCID: PMC267685          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.27.8.1863-1866.1989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  19 in total

1.  Rapid diagnosis of sexually transmitted diseases--speed has a price.

Authors:  J Schachter
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.803

2.  Evaluation of a monoclonal antibody test to detect chlamydia in cervical and urethral specimens.

Authors:  B A Forbes; N Bartholoma; J McMillan; M Roefaro; L Weiner; L Welych
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of monoclonal antibody staining and culture in diagnosing cervical chlamydial infection.

Authors:  E S Lipkin; J V Moncada; M A Shafer; T E Wilson; J Schachter
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparison of Dacron-tipped applicator and cytobrush for detection of chlamydial infections.

Authors:  T L Weiland; K L Noller; T F Smith; S J Ory
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Sensitivity of detecting Chlamydia trachomatis elementary bodies in smears by use of a fluorescein labelled monoclonal antibody: comparison with conventional chlamydial isolation.

Authors:  B J Thomas; R T Evans; D A Hawkins; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Screening for chlamydial infections in women attending family planning clinics.

Authors:  J Schachter; E Stoner; J Moncada
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1983-03

7.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigens by enzyme immunoassay and immunofluorescence in genital specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic men and women.

Authors:  M A Chernesky; J B Mahony; S Castriciano; M Mores; I O Stewart; S J Landis; W Seidelman; E J Sargeant; C Leman
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 5.226

8.  Cultivation of Chlamydia trachomatis in cycloheximide-treated mccoy cells.

Authors:  K T Ripa; P A Mårdh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Toxic effect of sampling swabs and transportation test tubes on the formation of intracytoplasmic inclusions of Chlamydia trachomatis in McCoy cell cultures.

Authors:  P A Mårdh; B Zeeberg
Journal:  Br J Vener Dis       Date:  1981-08

10.  Immunodiagnosis of sexually transmitted disease.

Authors:  J Schachter
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  1985 Sep-Oct
View more
  18 in total

1.  Accuracy of two enzyme immunoassays and cell culture in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in low and high risk populations in Senegal.

Authors:  E Van Dyck; N Samb; A D Sarr; L Van de Velden; J Moran; S Mboup; I Ndoye; J L Lamboray; A Meheus; P Piot
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Use of sequential enzyme immunoassay and direct fluorescent antibody tests for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women.

Authors:  J R Schwebke; W E Stamm; H H Handsfield
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  A comparison of cytobrush and cotton swab sampling for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by cell culture.

Authors:  M I Lees; D M Newnan; M Plackett; P W Traynor; J R Forsyth; S M Garland
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1990-08

Review 4.  Chlamydial infections.

Authors:  J Schachter
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1990-11

Review 5.  Laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of chlamydial infections.

Authors:  D Taylor-Robinson; B J Thomas
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1991-06

Review 6.  Current problems in microbiology: 1. Chlamydial infections: which laboratory test?

Authors:  G L Ridgway; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Effect of endocervical specimen quality on detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and on the incidence of false-positive results with the Chlamydiazyme method.

Authors:  J A Kellogg; J W Seiple; C L Murray; J S Levisky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Cervical sampling for diagnosis of genital chlamydial infection with a new brush device.

Authors:  L O Svensson; M Domeika; P A Mårdh
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1993-10

9.  Periodic health examination, 1996 update: 2. Screening for chlamydial infections. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors:  H D Davies; E E Wang
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-06-01       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Evaluation of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infections by cell culture and the polymerase chain reaction using a closed system.

Authors:  L Ostergaard; J Traulsen; S Birkelund; G Christiansen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.