Literature DB >> 16974145

Prevention of cochlear implant electrode damage.

Adrien A Eshraghi1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: As the current trend in cochlear implantation is to prescribe cochlear implants for patients with residual hearing and to use electroacoustic stimulation, cochlear implant damage must be prevented. This article summarizes current research endeavors to prevent electrode insertion trauma and resulting hearing loss. RECENT
FINDINGS: Alteration in surgical technique is necessary with each new electrode design. Nontraumatic surgical technique also requires minimizing acoustic trauma due to drilling the cochleostomy, mechanical damage from electrode insertion, potential infection, and fibrosis of the cochlea. The pattern of hearing loss following electrode insertion trauma is an immediate loss that results from direct trauma to the macroscopic elements of the cochlea and a delayed loss that may reflect the activation of inflammatory and cell death pathways. Therapies under investigation include glucocorticoids, inhibitors of cell death pathways, and hypothermia.
SUMMARY: Electrode insertion trauma-induced hearing loss involves multiple mechanisms ranging from mechanical insertion trauma to activation of inflammatory and cell death pathways. The macroscopic mechanical damage to the cochlea may be prevented by improvement of electrode design and surgical technique. The molecular damage needs further studies to assess the efficacy of novel therapeutic strategies in preserving functional residual hearing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16974145     DOI: 10.1097/01.moo.0000244189.74431.df

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 1068-9508            Impact factor:   2.064


  17 in total

1.  Impact of the surgical experience on cochleostomy location: a comparative temporal bone study between endaural and posterior tympanotomy approaches for cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Clair Vandersteen; Thomas Demarcy; Coralie Roger; Eric Fontas; Charles Raffaelli; Nicholas Ayache; Hervé Delingette; Nicolas Guevara
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  [Acoustic-mechanical trauma during cochleostomy: animal experimental studies].

Authors:  C Punke; T Zehlicke; U Sievert; H W Pau
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 3.  Soft cochlear implantation: rationale for the surgical approach.

Authors:  David R Friedland; Christina Runge-Samuelson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-06

4.  Bilateral Cochlear Implants Using Two Electrode Lengths in Infants With Profound Deafness.

Authors:  Camille C Dunn; Elizabeth A Walker; Stephanie Gogel; Tanya Van Voorst; Marlan Hansen; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Multicenter surgical experience evaluation on the Mid-Scala electrode and insertion tools.

Authors:  Dzemal Gazibegovic; Eva M Bero
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Influence of cochleostomy and cochlear implant insertion on drug gradients following intratympanic application in Guinea pigs.

Authors:  E B King; J J Hartsock; S J O'Leary; A N Salt
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 1.854

7.  A Preliminary Investigation of the Air-Bone Gap: Changes in Intracochlear Sound Pressure With Air- and Bone-conducted Stimuli After Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Renee M Banakis Hartl; Jameson K Mattingly; Nathaniel T Greene; Herman A Jenkins; Stephen P Cass; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Intracochlear Pressure Transients During Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion.

Authors:  Nathaniel T Greene; Jameson K Mattingly; Renee M Banakis Hartl; Daniel J Tollin; Stephen P Cass
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes.

Authors:  Charles C Finley; Timothy A Holden; Laura K Holden; Bruce R Whiting; Richard A Chole; Gail J Neely; Timothy E Hullar; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Cochlear Implant Electrode Effect on Sound Energy Transfer Within the Cochlea During Acoustic Stimulation.

Authors:  Nathaniel T Greene; Jameson K Mattingly; Herman A Jenkins; Daniel J Tollin; James R Easter; Stephen P Cass
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.