Literature DB >> 21424134

[Acoustic-mechanical trauma during cochleostomy: animal experimental studies].

C Punke1, T Zehlicke, U Sievert, H W Pau.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: When performing cochlear implant (CI) surgery in ears with residual hearing, cochlear function should be preserved as far as possible. Besides non-traumatic electrode insertion the acoustic-mechanical trauma of the cochleostomy should be minimized. According to experiences from temporal bone preparations the hypothesis that thorough exposition of the endosteal membrane with the drill prior to opening the cochlea might constitute a bigger acoustic mechanical trauma than direct drilling of the inner ear was examined. These experiments were performed in an animal model. MATERIAL AND
METHOD: In 12 guinea pigs the cochlear capsule was exposed by opening the bulla under general anesthesia. In 6 animals the fluid-filled cochlea was exposed by careful unilateral abrasion of the bone, whereas on the other ear cochleostomy was performed by direct penetration drilling into the perilymphatic spaces. Hearing tests were performed before and after drilling by measuring evoked brainstem potentials (brainstem electric response audiometry, BERA). In 8 other guinea pig ears abrasive exposition of the cochlea was performed again by only softly touching the otic capsule with the running burr for 10 s. After a hearing test the drilling maneuver was repeated 4 times collectively. Thereby the inner ear was gradually opened from the surface but not deeper into the cochlear lumen. A total of 4 guinea pig ears treated with a single abrasion of 10 s were used as controls. Brain stem measurements were performed accordingly.
RESULTS: Hearing loss was lower after a quick direct and deep penetration of the cochlea in comparison to a longer, less invasive opening of the inner ear. Hearing thresholds ascended depending on the duration of the drilling procedure.
CONCLUSION: The results support the hypothesis that prolonged drilling of exposed inner ear structures causes more acoustical damage than a direct cochleostomy with the drill.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21424134     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-010-2257-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  8 in total

Review 1.  Prevention of cochlear implant electrode damage.

Authors:  Adrien A Eshraghi
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.064

2.  New strategies for high precision surgery of the temporal bone using a robotic approach for cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Thomas Klenzner; Chiu Chun Ngan; Felix Bernhard Knapp; Hayo Knoop; Jan Kromeier; Antje Aschendorff; Evangelos Papastathopoulos; Joerg Raczkowsky; Heinz Wörn; Joerg Schipper
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  [Intracochlear placement of cochlear implant electrodes in soft surgery technique].

Authors:  E Lehnhardt
Journal:  HNO       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Cochlear implantation in patients with substantial residual hearing.

Authors:  Robert D Cullen; Carol Higgins; Emily Buss; Marcia Clark; Harold C Pillsbury; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Noise exposure of the inner ear during drilling a cochleostomy for cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Hans Wilhelm Pau; Tino Just; Matthias Bornitz; Nikoloz Lasurashvilli; Thomas Zahnert
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  [Inner ear damage due to leisure and broadband noise. An experimental study on initial and permanent functional and morphological damage].

Authors:  K Lamm; C Michaelis; K Deingruber; R Scheler; H-J Steinhoff; I Gröber; M Huth; C Kutscher; W Arnold
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  Conservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation.

Authors:  A V Hodges; J Schloffman; T Balkany
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1997-03

8.  Combining acoustic and electrical hearing.

Authors:  Bruce J Gantz; Christopher W Turner
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.325

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  [Aspects of inner ear trauma in CI treatment].

Authors:  T Klenzner
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 2.  Surgery of the ear and the lateral skull base: pitfalls and complications.

Authors:  Bernhard Schick; Julia Dlugaiczyk
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-12-13
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.