Literature DB >> 16964513

Anthropometry of the medial tibial condyle to design the tibial component for unicondylar knee arthroplasty for the Korean population.

Sibin Surendran1, Dai Soon Kwak, U Young Lee, Sang Eun Park, Patinharayil Gopinathan, Seung Ho Han, Chang Whan Han.   

Abstract

Unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) has gained popularity in the recent years for treating medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee joint in the Asian population. There is little information about the anthropometry of the resected bony surfaces of the knee joint in these population groups for designing the appropriate size-matched UKA components. We studied the anthropometry of the resected medial tibial condyles in 50 male and 50 female Korean cadavers by using three-dimensional computer tomography. We measured the anteroposterior dimension, the mediolateral dimension at defined points and the condylar aspect ratio. These measurements were compared with similar dimensions of the tibial components from five conventionally used UKA designs. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-test, Paired t-test and Pearson's correlation coefficient. We found that three of the tibial component designs showed mediolateral overhang for the whole range of measured anteroposterior dimensions of the resected medial tibial condyles, whereas one of the designs (DePuy) showed mediolateral undersizing for the smaller AP dimensions and overhang for the larger AP dimensions of the resected medial tibial condyles. Another design (Smith and Nephew) showed mediolateral undersizing for the whole range of measured anteroposterior dimensions of the resected medial tibial condyle. We found a decrease in the condylar aspect ratio with increasing AP dimension for our cadaver population data. However, the majority of the conventional tibial prosthesis showed either a constant condylar aspect ratio or an increasing aspect ratio (DePuy) with the increasing AP dimension of the resected medial tibial condyle. Our study may provide guidelines for designing appropriate tibial UKA components for a majority of Asian sub-populations and encourage similar studies in other population groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16964513     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-006-0188-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  10 in total

1.  Anthropometric measurements to design total knee prostheses for the Indian population.

Authors:  S V Vaidya; C S Ranawat; A Aroojis; N S Laud
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  The radiographic classification of medial gonarthrosis. Correlation with operation methods in 200 knees.

Authors:  G W Keyes; A J Carr; R K Miller; J W Goodfellow
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1992-10

3.  The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study.

Authors:  D W Murray; J W Goodfellow; J J O'Connor
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1998-11

Review 4.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: long-term results.

Authors:  R V Deshmukh; R D Scott
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Anthropometry of the proximal tibia to design a total knee prosthesis for the Japanese population.

Authors:  K Uehara; Y Kadoya; A Kobayashi; H Ohashi; Y Yamano
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clinical experience at 6- to 10-year followup.

Authors:  R A Berger; D D Nedeff; R M Barden; M M Sheinkop; J J Jacobs; A G Rosenberg; J O Galante
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Technical considerations in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  L D Dorr; R A Boiardo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. A survival study of the Oxford meniscal knee.

Authors:  A Carr; G Keyes; R Miller; J O'Connor; J Goodfellow
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Anthropometric measurements of the human knee: correlation to the sizing of current knee arthroplasty systems.

Authors:  Kirby Hitt; John R Shurman; Kenneth Greene; Joseph McCarthy; Joseph Moskal; Tim Hoeman; Michael A Mont
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  A comparison of tricompartmental and unicompartmental arthroplasty for the treatment of gonarthrosis.

Authors:  B T Rougraff; D A Heck; A E Gibson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.176

  10 in total
  14 in total

1.  Is the medial wall of the intercondylar notch useful for tibial rotational reference in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Shinya Kawahara; Shuichi Matsuda; Ken Okazaki; Yasutaka Tashiro; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Morphometrical measurement of resected surface of medial and lateral proximal tibia for Chinese population.

Authors:  Tsung-Wei Chang; Chang-Hung Huang; Colin J McClean; Yu-Shu Lai; Yung-Chang Lu; Cheng-Kung Cheng
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Use of anthropometric data from the medial tibial and femoral condyles to design unicondylar knee prostheses in the Chinese population.

Authors:  Fu Bo Cheng; Xiao Feng Ji; Wen Xu Zheng; Ying Lai; Kai Liang Cheng; Jia Chun Feng; You Qiong Li
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Current fit of medial and lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Wolfgang Fitz; Robin Bliss; Elena Losina
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 0.500

5.  CT Morphometric Analysis of Medial Tibial Condyles: Are the Currently Available Designs of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Suitable for Indian Knees?

Authors:  Radhakrishna Kantanavar; Mohan Madhav Desai; Hemant Pandit
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 1.033

Review 6.  [Implant with a mobile or a fixed bearing in unicompartmental knee joint replacemen].

Authors:  G Matziolis; S Tohtz; B Gengenbach; C Perka
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Lateral versus medial tibial plateau: morphometric analysis and adaptability with current tibial component design.

Authors:  E Servien; M Saffarini; S Lustig; S Chomel; Ph Neyret
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  Complications of medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jong Hun Ji; Sang Eun Park; In Soo Song; Hanvit Kang; Ji Yoon Ha; Jae Jung Jeong
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2014-11-10

9.  Bearing Dislocation and Progression of Osteoarthritis After Mobile-bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Vary Between Asian and Western Patients: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kyung-Han Ro; Jae-Won Heo; Dae-Hee Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Anatomic tibial component design can increase tibial coverage and rotational alignment accuracy: a comparison of six contemporary designs.

Authors:  Yifei Dai; Giles R Scuderi; Jeffrey E Bischoff; Kim Bertin; Samih Tarabichi; Ashok Rajgopal
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.