Literature DB >> 10546598

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clinical experience at 6- to 10-year followup.

R A Berger1, D D Nedeff, R M Barden, M M Sheinkop, J J Jacobs, A G Rosenberg, J O Galante.   

Abstract

Sixty-two consecutive cemented modular unicompartmental knee arthroplasties in 51 patients were studied prospectively. At surgery, the other compartments had at most Grade 2 chondromalacia. The average age of the patients at arthroplasty was 68 years (range, 51-84 years). One patient was lost to followup and 10 died with less than 6 years followup. The average followup of the remaining 51 knees was 7.5 years (range, 6-10 years). The preoperative Hospital for Special Surgery knee score of 55 points (range, 30-79 points) improved to 92 points (range, 60-100 points) at followup; 78% (40 knees) had excellent and 20% (10 knees) had good results. The mean range of motion at followup was 120 degrees with 26 knees (51%) having range of motion greater than 120 degrees. One patient underwent revision surgery for retained cement, one patient underwent knee manipulation, and one patient underwent revision surgery at 7 years for opposite compartment degeneration and pain. Radiographically, 26 knees (51%) had at least one partial radiolucency. There were no complete femoral radiolucencies, but there were three complete tibial radiolucencies, all less than 2 mm. No component was loose as seen on radiographs. At final followup, five of the opposite compartments (10%) and three of the patellofemoral joints (6%) had some progressive radiographic joint space loss; this was less than a 25% loss in all but one knee component that was revised. At 6- to 10-years followup, cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty yielded excellent clinical and radiographic results. The 10-year survival using radiographic loosening or revision as the end point was 98%. Using stringent selection criteria, unicompartmental knee replacement can yield excellent results and represents a superb alternative to total knee replacement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10546598

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  51 in total

1.  The impact of a high tibial valgus osteotomy and unicondylar medial arthroplasty on the treatment for knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gunter Spahn; Gunther O Hofmann; Lars Victor von Engelhardt; Mengxia Li; Henning Neubauer; Hans Michael Klinger
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Fracture of the femoral component of a Brigham unicompartmental knee: a case report.

Authors:  Konstantinos Panousis; Claire Murnaghan; Petra Koettig; Peter Grigoris
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Unicompartmental knee replacements with Miller-Galante prosthesis: two to 16-year follow-up of a single surgeon series.

Authors:  Joby John; C Mauffrey; Peter May
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-04-25       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Minimally invasive knee arthroplasty: An overview.

Authors:  Alfred J Tria; Giles R Scuderi
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-11-18

5.  Posteromedial compartment cement extrusion after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty treated by arthroscopy: a case report.

Authors:  Weon Yoo Kim; Mohamed Shafi; Young Yul Kim; Jin Young Kim; Yun Kyoung Cho; Chang Whan Han
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  [Minimally invasive unicondylar knee replacement with computer navigation].

Authors:  R G Haaker; M Wojciechowski; P Patzer; R E Willburger; M Senkal; M Engelhardt
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  [Minimally invasive implantation in unicondylar arthroplasty].

Authors:  R Hube; M Keim
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  [In vivo biomechanics of unicondylar knee replacement performed using minimally invasive technique].

Authors:  J-N A Argenson; R D Komistek; S Akizuki
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Long-term survivorship and failure modes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jared R H Foran; Nicholas M Brown; Craig J Della Valle; Richard A Berger; Jorge O Galante
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  ACL reconstruction with unicondylar replacement in knee with functional instability and osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Srikrishna R S R Krishnan; Ray Randle
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.