Literature DB >> 22015998

Is the medial wall of the intercondylar notch useful for tibial rotational reference in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty?

Shinya Kawahara1, Shuichi Matsuda, Ken Okazaki, Yasutaka Tashiro, Yukihide Iwamoto.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is difficult to implant components in the correct rotational position in the narrow operating field in a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Although no rotational reference has been confirmed for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, the AP axis of the tibia may serve as a reference for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and TKA. However, it is difficult to identify the AP axis during unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, especially with the tibia first-cut technique. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We explored whether the medial wall of the intercondylar notch could be useful for the tibial rotational reference as an alternative to the AP axis in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
METHODS: We scanned the knees of 24 healthy Asian patients (45 knees) at a flexion angle of 90º using open MRI, then measured the angle between the AP axis and the medial wall of the notch. We determined whether the origins of the ACL and PCL were located lateral to the line on the medial wall of the notch and whether the mediolateral dimension of the bone cut surface of the medial tibial plateau was wide enough relative to the AP dimension to use the commercially available unicompartmental knee arthroplasty tibial components when the tibia was cut parallel to the medial wall of the notch.
RESULTS: At 90º flexion the medial wall of the notch was externally rotated 0.1º ± 4.4º relative to the AP axis. In all knees, the ACL and PCL were located lateral to the line on the medial wall of the notch. The mediolateral dimension of the bone cut surface was wide enough to use the commercially available tibial components.
CONCLUSIONS: At 90º flexion the medial wall of the intercondylar notch is almost parallel to the AP axis of the tibia at and we believe a reasonable candidate for a rotational reference of tibial placement in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. This landmark would need to be confirmed in other populations and in patients with osteoarthritis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22015998      PMCID: PMC3293949          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-2138-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  30 in total

Review 1.  Unicondylar knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  S C Kozinn; R Scott
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  The influence of the tibial sagittal cut on component position in the Oxford knee.

Authors:  David Shakespeare; Michael Ledger; Vera Kinzel
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study.

Authors:  D W Murray; J W Goodfellow; J J O'Connor
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1998-11

4.  The transepicondylar axis approximates the optimal flexion axis of the knee.

Authors:  D L Churchill; S J Incavo; C C Johnson; B D Beynnon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Morphology of the transepicondylar axis and its application in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J B Stiehl; B D Abbott
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgery. 10-year minimum follow-up period.

Authors:  P Cartier; J L Sanouiller; R P Grelsamer
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Postoperative alignment and its influence on overall results.

Authors:  W R Kennedy; R P White
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. A survival study of the Oxford meniscal knee.

Authors:  A Carr; G Keyes; R Miller; J O'Connor; J Goodfellow
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  The axes of rotation of the knee.

Authors:  A M Hollister; S Jatana; A K Singh; W W Sullivan; A G Lupichuk
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R A Berger; L S Crossett; J J Jacobs; H E Rubash
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  4 in total

1.  Tibial component rotation during the unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: is the anterior superior iliac spine an appropriate landmark?

Authors:  Seung-Yup Lee; Suhwoo Chay; Hong-Chul Lim; Ji-Hoon Bae
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  The coronal alignment after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty can be predicted: usefulness of full-length valgus stress radiography for evaluating correctability.

Authors:  Yasutaka Tashiro; Shuichi Matsuda; Ken Okazaki; Hideki Mizu-Uchi; Umito Kuwashima; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Effect of vertical cut on coronal coverage and rotation of tibial component in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Guanghan Gao; Zheng Li; Yannong Wang; Guangzhong Yang; Jiang Huang; Shuai An; Junjie Qiao; Guanglei Cao
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.671

4.  Correction of coronal alignment correlates with reconstruction of joint height in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  U Kuwashima; K Okazaki; Y Tashiro; H Mizu-Uchi; S Hamai; S Okamoto; K Murakami; Y Iwamoto
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.853

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.