Literature DB >> 25665427

[Effect of oral alloy post and core on magnetic resonance imaging].

Yin Fang, Li Xin, Ma Qingyun, Wang Lu, Song Ye.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to observe and compare the influences of the casting alloy post and cores on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
METHODS: Six casting alloy post and sores were fabricated for the experimental groups, and zirconia post and core served as the control. The seven types of post and cores were of the same size and shape. Each post and core was orally fastened to a volunteer and then imaged with sequences of T1-weighted spin echo imaging (SE-T1WI), T2-weighted turbo spin-echo imaging (TSE-T2WI), and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI).
RESULTS: Cobalt chromium alloy post and core generated severe artifacts, whereas gold palladium alloy post and core generated no obvious artifacts, and no difference was observed between the zirconia and the gold palladium alloy post and cores (P > 0.05). The pure titanium alloy post and core produced mild artifacts. The post and cores of the titanium, nickel-cadmium, and gold platinum alloys generated moderate artifacts with no significant differences (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Different metal post and cores have different influences on MRI. With the exception of that generated by cobalt chromium alloy, the artifact generated by the single-alloy post and core does not influence the image of the normal head and neck.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25665427      PMCID: PMC7030705     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi        ISSN: 1000-1182


  9 in total

1.  Effect of interference of metallic objects on interpretation of T1-weighted magnetic resonance images in the maxillofacial region.

Authors:  K Abbaszadeh; L B Heffez; M F Mafee
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2000-06

Review 2.  Advanced imaging: Magnetic resonance imaging in implant dentistry.

Authors:  Crawford F Gray; Thomas W Redpath; Francis W Smith; Roger T Staff
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.977

3.  Artifacts from dental casting alloys in magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  F Shafiei; E Honda; H Takahashi; T Sasaki
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 4.  Imaging artifacts at 3.0T.

Authors:  Matt A Bernstein; John Huston; Heidi A Ward
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Fabrication of a custom-made ceramic post and core using CAD-CAM technology.

Authors:  Mohamed Abdelmageed Awad; Thamer Yousif Marghalani
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.426

6.  Dental materials and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Hana Hubálková; Karel Hora; Zdenek Seidl; Jan Krásenský
Journal:  Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent       Date:  2002-09

7.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in acute stroke.

Authors:  K J van Everdingen; J van der Grond; L J Kappelle; L M Ramos; W P Mali
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  MR imaging in patients with metallic implants.

Authors:  R W Laakman; B Kaufman; J S Han; A D Nelson; M Clampitt; A M O'Block; J R Haaga; R J Alfidi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Postimplantation MRI with cylindric and cubic intervertebral test implants: evaluation of implant shape, material, and volume in MRI artifacting--an in vitro study.

Authors:  Thorsten Ernstberger; Gabert Heidrich; Gottfried Buchhorn
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 4.166

  9 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Unwanted effects due to interactions between dental materials and magnetic resonance imaging: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Sherin Jose Chockattu; Deepak Byathnal Suryakant; Sophia Thakur
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2018-08-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.