Literature DB >> 18063391

Intensity non-uniformity correction using N3 on 3-T scanners with multichannel phased array coils.

Richard G Boyes1, Jeff L Gunter, Chris Frost, Andrew L Janke, Thomas Yeatman, Derek L G Hill, Matt A Bernstein, Paul M Thompson, Michael W Weiner, Norbert Schuff, Gene E Alexander, Ronald J Killiany, Charles DeCarli, Clifford R Jack, Nick C Fox.   

Abstract

Measures of structural brain change based on longitudinal MR imaging are increasingly important but can be degraded by intensity non-uniformity. This non-uniformity can be more pronounced at higher field strengths, or when using multichannel receiver coils. We assessed the ability of the non-parametric non-uniform intensity normalization (N3) technique to correct non-uniformity in 72 volumetric brain MR scans from the preparatory phase of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). Normal elderly subjects (n=18) were scanned on different 3-T scanners with a multichannel phased array receiver coil at baseline, using magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo (MP-RAGE) and spoiled gradient echo (SPGR) pulse sequences, and again 2 weeks later. When applying N3, we used five brain masks of varying accuracy and four spline smoothing distances (d=50, 100, 150 and 200 mm) to ascertain which combination of parameters optimally reduces the non-uniformity. We used the normalized white matter intensity variance (standard deviation/mean) to ascertain quantitatively the correction for a single scan; we used the variance of the normalized difference image to assess quantitatively the consistency of the correction over time from registered scan pairs. Our results showed statistically significant (p<0.01) improvement in uniformity for individual scans and reduction in the normalized difference image variance when using masks that identified distinct brain tissue classes, and when using smaller spline smoothing distances (e.g., 50-100 mm) for both MP-RAGE and SPGR pulse sequences. These optimized settings may assist future large-scale studies where 3-T scanners and phased array receiver coils are used, such as ADNI, so that intensity non-uniformity does not influence the power of MR imaging to detect disease progression and the factors that influence it.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18063391      PMCID: PMC2562663          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  27 in total

1.  Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of six algorithms for correcting intensity nonuniformity effects.

Authors:  J B Arnold; J S Liow; K A Schaper; J J Stern; J G Sled; D W Shattuck; A J Worth; M S Cohen; R M Leahy; J C Mazziotta; D A Rottenberg
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Normalized accurate measurement of longitudinal brain change.

Authors:  S M Smith; N De Stefano; M Jenkinson; P M Matthews
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Intensity non-uniformity correction in MRI: existing methods and their validation.

Authors:  Boubakeur Belaroussi; Julien Milles; Sabin Carme; Yue Min Zhu; Hugues Benoit-Cattin
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 8.545

4.  Polynomial modeling and reduction of RF body coil spatial inhomogeneity in MRI.

Authors:  M Tincher; C R Meyer; R Gupta; D M Williams
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Adaptive segmentation of MRI data.

Authors:  W M Wells; W L Grimson; R Kikinis; F A Jolesz
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data.

Authors:  J G Sled; A P Zijdenbos; A C Evans
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Interactive algorithms for the segmentation and quantitation of 3-D MRI brain scans.

Authors:  P A Freeborough; N C Fox; R I Kitney
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information.

Authors:  F Maes; A Collignon; D Vandermeulen; G Marchal; P Suetens
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  4D deformation modeling of cortical disease progression in Alzheimer's dementia.

Authors:  A L Janke; G de Zubicaray; S E Rose; M Griffin; J B Chalk; G J Galloway
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  The boundary shift integral: an accurate and robust measure of cerebral volume changes from registered repeat MRI.

Authors:  P A Freeborough; N C Fox
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 10.048

View more
  62 in total

Review 1.  Update on the magnetic resonance imaging core of the Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative.

Authors:  Clifford R Jack; Matt A Bernstein; Bret J Borowski; Jeffrey L Gunter; Nick C Fox; Paul M Thompson; Norbert Schuff; Gunnar Krueger; Ronald J Killiany; Charles S Decarli; Anders M Dale; Owen W Carmichael; Duygu Tosun; Michael W Weiner
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 21.566

Review 2.  The Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative: progress report and future plans.

Authors:  Michael W Weiner; Paul S Aisen; Clifford R Jack; William J Jagust; John Q Trojanowski; Leslie Shaw; Andrew J Saykin; John C Morris; Nigel Cairns; Laurel A Beckett; Arthur Toga; Robert Green; Sarah Walter; Holly Soares; Peter Snyder; Eric Siemers; William Potter; Patricia E Cole; Mark Schmidt
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 21.566

Review 3.  The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: a review of papers published since its inception.

Authors:  Michael W Weiner; Dallas P Veitch; Paul S Aisen; Laurel A Beckett; Nigel J Cairns; Robert C Green; Danielle Harvey; Clifford R Jack; William Jagust; Enchi Liu; John C Morris; Ronald C Petersen; Andrew J Saykin; Mark E Schmidt; Leslie Shaw; Judith A Siuciak; Holly Soares; Arthur W Toga; John Q Trojanowski
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 21.566

Review 4.  Computational analysis of cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Hidemasa Takao; Osamu Abe; Kuni Ohtomo
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Influence of signal intensity non-uniformity on brain volumetry using an atlas-based method.

Authors:  Masami Goto; Osamu Abe; Tosiaki Miyati; Hiroyuki Kabasawa; Hidemasa Takao; Naoto Hayashi; Tomomi Kurosu; Takeshi Iwatsubo; Fumio Yamashita; Hiroshi Matsuda; Harushi Mori; Akira Kunimatsu; Shigeki Aoki; Kenji Ino; Keiichi Yano; Kuni Ohtomo
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  A toolbox for multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation.

Authors:  Eloy Roura; Arnau Oliver; Mariano Cabezas; Sergi Valverde; Deborah Pareto; Joan C Vilanova; Lluís Ramió-Torrentà; Àlex Rovira; Xavier Lladó
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Voxel Level Survival Analysis of Grey Matter Volume and Incident Mild Cognitive Impairment or Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Lubov E Zeifman; William F Eddy; Oscar L Lopez; Lewis H Kuller; Cyrus Raji; Paul M Thompson; James T Becker
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.472

8.  Automated mapping of hippocampal atrophy in 1-year repeat MRI data from 490 subjects with Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, and elderly controls.

Authors:  Jonathan H Morra; Zhuowen Tu; Liana G Apostolova; Amity E Green; Christina Avedissian; Sarah K Madsen; Neelroop Parikshak; Arthur W Toga; Clifford R Jack; Norbert Schuff; Michael W Weiner; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Is it time to re-prioritize neuroimaging databases and digital repositories?

Authors:  John Darrell Van Horn; Arthur W Toga
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Automated 3D mapping of hippocampal atrophy and its clinical correlates in 400 subjects with Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, and elderly controls.

Authors:  Jonathan H Morra; Zhuowen Tu; Liana G Apostolova; Amity E Green; Christina Avedissian; Sarah K Madsen; Neelroop Parikshak; Xue Hua; Arthur W Toga; Clifford R Jack; Norbert Schuff; Michael W Weiner; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.