Literature DB >> 25663561

How different spatial representations interact in virtual environments: the role of mental frame syncing.

Silvia Serino1, Giuseppe Riva.   

Abstract

This experiment is aimed at understanding how egocentric experiences, allocentric viewpoint-dependent representations, and allocentric viewpoint-independent representations interact when encoding and retrieving a spatial environment. Although several cognitive theories have highlighted the interaction between reference frames, it is less clear about the role of a real-time presentation of allocentric viewpoint-dependent representation on the spatial organization of information. Sixty participants were asked to navigate in two virtual cities to memorize the position of one hidden object. Half of the participants had the possibility to visualize the virtual city with an interactive aerial view. Then, they were required to find the position of the object in three different experimental conditions ("retrieval with an interactive aerial view" vs. "retrieval on a map" vs. "retrieval without an interactive aerial view"). Results revealed that participants were significantly more precise in retrieving the position of the object when immersed in an egocentric experience with the interactive aerial view. The retrieval of spatial information is facilitated by the presence of the interactive aerial view of the city, since it provides a real-time allocentric viewpoint-dependent representation. More participants with high preference for using cardinal points tend to be more accurate when they were asked to retrieve the position of the object on the map. As suggested by the mental frame syncing hypothesis, the presence of an allocentric viewpoint-dependent representation during the retrieval seems to ease the imposition on a specific viewpoint on the stored abstract allocentric viewpoint-independent representation. Our findings represent another significant step toward the comprehension of the organization of spatial representations of our environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25663561     DOI: 10.1007/s10339-015-0646-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Process        ISSN: 1612-4782


  40 in total

1.  Spatial knowledge acquisition from direct experience in the environment: individual differences in the development of metric knowledge and the integration of separately learned places.

Authors:  Toru Ishikawa; Daniel R Montello
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Layout geometry in the selection of intrinsic frames of reference from multiple viewpoints.

Authors:  Weimin Mou; Mintao Zhao; Timothy P McNamara
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 3.  Multiple systems of spatial memory and action.

Authors:  Marios N Avraamides; Jonathan W Kelly
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2007-09-27

4.  Parietal cortex codes for egocentric space beyond the field of view.

Authors:  Andreas Schindler; Andreas Bartels
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge.

Authors:  R D Easton; M J Sholl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Monkey hippocampal neurons related to spatial and nonspatial functions.

Authors:  T Ono; K Nakamura; H Nishijo; S Eifuku
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Orientation in cognitive maps.

Authors:  D L Hintzman; C S O'Dell; D R Arndt
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  The retrosplenial contribution to human navigation: a review of lesion and neuroimaging findings.

Authors:  E A Maguire
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2001-07

9.  Cellular networks underlying human spatial navigation.

Authors:  Arne D Ekstrom; Michael J Kahana; Jeremy B Caplan; Tony A Fields; Eve A Isham; Ehren L Newman; Itzhak Fried
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-09-11       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 10.  Head direction cells and the neurophysiological basis for a sense of direction.

Authors:  J S Taube
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 11.685

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  A succinct overview of virtual reality technology use in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Rebeca I García-Betances; María Teresa Arredondo Waldmeyer; Giuseppe Fico; María Fernanda Cabrera-Umpiérrez
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 5.750

2.  A Novel Virtual Reality-Based Training Protocol for the Enhancement of the "Mental Frame Syncing" in Individuals with Alzheimer's Disease: A Development-of-Concept Trial.

Authors:  Silvia Serino; Elisa Pedroli; Cosimo Tuena; Gianluca De Leo; Marco Stramba-Badiale; Karine Goulene; Noemi G Mariotti; Giuseppe Riva
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 5.750

3.  Disentangling the Contribution of Spatial Reference Frames to Executive Functioning in Healthy and Pathological Aging: An Experimental Study with Virtual Reality.

Authors:  Silvia Serino; Francesca Morganti; Desirée Colombo; Elisa Pedroli; Pietro Cipresso; Giuseppe Riva
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.576

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.