Literature DB >> 11741344

Systems of spatial reference in human memory.

A L Shelton1, T P McNamara.   

Abstract

Seven experiments examined the spatial reference systems used in memory to represent the locations of objects in the environment. Participants learned the locations of common objects in a room and then made judgments of relative direction using their memories of the layout (e.g., "Imagine you are standing at the shoe, facing the lamp; point to the clock"). The experiments manipulated the number of views that observers were allowed to experience, the presence or absence of local and global reference systems (e.g., a rectangular mat on which objects were placed and the walls of the room, respectively), and the congruence of local and global reference systems. Judgments of relative direction were more accurate for imagined headings parallel to study views than for imagined headings parallel to novel views, even with up to three study views. However, study views misaligned with salient reference systems in the environment were not strongly represented if they were experienced in the context of aligned views. Novel views aligned with a local reference system were, under certain conditions, easier to imagine than were novel views misaligned with the local reference system. We propose that learning and remembering the spatial structure of the surrounding environment involves interpreting the layout in terms of a spatial reference system. This reference system is imposed on the environment but defined by egocentric experience. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11741344     DOI: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  113 in total

1.  Neural correlates of encoding space from route and survey perspectives.

Authors:  Amy L Shelton; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Active and passive contributions to spatial learning.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Chrastil; William H Warren
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-02

3.  Tests enhance retention and transfer of spatial learning.

Authors:  Shana K Carpenter; Jonathan W Kelly
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-06

4.  Do you know where your fingers have been? Explicit knowledge of the spatial layout of the keyboard in skilled typists.

Authors:  Xianyun Liu; Matthew J C Crump; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-06

Review 5.  Building a cognitive map by assembling multiple path integration systems.

Authors:  Ranxiao Frances Wang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-06

6.  An implicit spatial memory alignment effect.

Authors:  Mélanie Cerles; Alice Gomez; Stéphane Rousset
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-09

7.  Age-related differences in pointing accuracy in familiar and unfamiliar environments.

Authors:  Veronica Muffato; Martina Della Giustina; Chiara Meneghetti; Rossana De Beni
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-09

8.  Sex Differences in Exploration Behavior and the Relationship to Harm Avoidance.

Authors:  Kyle T Gagnon; Elizabeth A Cashdan; Jeanine K Stefanucci; Sarah H Creem-Regehr
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2016-03

9.  Verbalizing, visualizing, and navigating: The effect of strategies on encoding a large-scale virtual environment.

Authors:  David J M Kraemer; Victor R Schinazi; Philip B Cawkwell; Anand Tekriwal; Russell A Epstein; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Facilitated pointing to remembered objects in front: evidence for egocentric retrieval or for spatial priming?

Authors:  Jonathan W Kelly; Timothy P McNamara
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.