Literature DB >> 10479831

Spatial knowledge acquisition from maps and from navigation in real and virtual environments.

A E Richardson1, D R Montello, M Hegarty.   

Abstract

In this study, the nature of the spatial representations of an environment acquired from maps, navigation, and virtual environments (VEs) was assessed. Participants first learned the layout of a simple desktop VE and then were tested in that environment. Then, participants learned two floors of a complex building in one of three learning conditions: from a map, from direct experience, or by traversing through a virtual rendition of the building. VE learners showed the poorest learning of the complex environment overall, and the results suggest that VE learners are particularly susceptible to disorientation after rotation. However, all the conditions showed similar levels of performance in learning the layout of landmarks on a single floor. Consistent with previous research, an alignment effect was present for map learners, suggesting that they had formed an orientation-specific representation of the environment. VE learners also showed a preferred orientation, as defined by their initial orientation when learning the environment. Learning the initial simple VE was highly predictive of learning a real environment, suggesting that similar cognitive mechanisms are involved in the two learning situations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10479831     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  11 in total

1.  Orientation specificity in spatial memory: what makes a path different from a map of the path?

Authors:  C C Presson; N DeLange; M D Hazelrigg
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Absolute error.

Authors:  R W Schutz; E A Roy
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation.

Authors:  J J Rieser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Sensitivity to perspective structure while walking without vision.

Authors:  J J Rieser; D A Guth; E W Hill
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Orientation-specificity in kinesthetic spatial learning: the role of multiple orientations.

Authors:  C C Presson; N DeLange; M D Hazelrigg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1987-05

6.  Cognitive mapping: knowledge of real-world distance and location information.

Authors:  G W Evans; K Pezdek
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-01

7.  Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation.

Authors:  P W Thorndyke; B Hayes-Roth
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Personality correlates of sense of direction and geographical orientation.

Authors:  K J Bryant
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1982-12

9.  Restricting the field of view: perceptual and performance effects.

Authors:  P L Alfano; G F Michel
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1990-02

10.  Updating after rotational and translational body movements: coordinate structure of perspective space.

Authors:  C C Presson; D R Montello
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  63 in total

1.  Are allocentric spatial reference frames compatible with theories of Enactivism?

Authors:  Sabine U König; Caspar Goeke; Tobias Meilinger; Peter König
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-08-02

2.  Updating space during imagined self- and array translations.

Authors:  Sarah H Creem-Regehr
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-09

3.  Memory for targets in a multilevel simulated environment: evidence for vertical asymmetry in spatial memory.

Authors:  Paul N Wilson; Nigel Foreman; Danaë Stanton; Hester Duffy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-03

4.  Inertial cues do not enhance knowledge of environmental layout.

Authors:  David Waller; Jack M Loomis; Sibylle D Steck
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

Review 5.  Active and passive contributions to spatial learning.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Chrastil; William H Warren
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-02

6.  Behaviorism, latent learning, and cognitive maps: needed revisions in introductory psychology textbooks.

Authors:  Robert Jensen
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2006

Review 7.  Building a cognitive map by assembling multiple path integration systems.

Authors:  Ranxiao Frances Wang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-06

8.  Sex Differences in Exploration Behavior and the Relationship to Harm Avoidance.

Authors:  Kyle T Gagnon; Elizabeth A Cashdan; Jeanine K Stefanucci; Sarah H Creem-Regehr
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2016-03

9.  Learning to Reach to Locations Encoded from Imaging Displays.

Authors:  Bing Wu; Roberta L Klatzky; George Stetten
Journal:  Spat Cogn Comput       Date:  2008-10

10.  Verbalizing, visualizing, and navigating: The effect of strategies on encoding a large-scale virtual environment.

Authors:  David J M Kraemer; Victor R Schinazi; Philip B Cawkwell; Anand Tekriwal; Russell A Epstein; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.