Literature DB >> 16957937

Small-animal MRI: signal-to-noise ratio comparison at 7 and 1.5 T with multiple-animal acquisition strategies.

Olivier Beuf1, Franck Jaillon, Hervé Saint-Jalmes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of phantom and rat brain images performed at 1.5 T on a clinical MR system and at 7 T on a small-animal experimental system. Comparison was carried out by taking into account SNR values based on a single sample acquisition at 1.5 and 7 T as well as on simultaneous imaging of multiple samples at 1.5 T.
METHODS: SNR was experimentally assessed on a phantom and rat brains at 1.5 and 7 T using 25 mm surface coils and compared to theoretical SNR gain estimations. The feasibility of multiple-animal imaging, using the hardware capabilities available on the 1.5 T system, was demonstrated. Finally, rat brain images obtained on a single animal at 7 T and on multiple animals acquired simultaneously at 1.5 T were compared.
RESULTS: Experimentally determined SNR at 7 T was far below theoretical estimations. Taking into account chemical shift, susceptibility artifacts and modifications of T1 and T2 relaxation times at higher field, a 7-T system holds limited advantage over a 1.5-T system. Instead, a multiple-animal acquisition methodology was demonstrated on a clinical 1.5-T scanner. This acquisition method significantly increases imaging efficiency and competes with single animal acquisitions at higher field.
CONCLUSION: Multiple-animal imaging using a standard clinical scanner has a great potential as a high-throughput acquisition method for small animals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16957937     DOI: 10.1007/s10334-006-0048-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MAGMA        ISSN: 0968-5243            Impact factor:   2.310


  13 in total

1.  A sixteen-channel multiplexing upgrade for single channel receivers.

Authors:  J R Porter; S M Wright
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  NMR probe for the simultaneous acquisition of multiple samples.

Authors:  G Fisher; C Petucci; E MacNamara; D Raftery
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  NMR-microscopy with TrueFISP at 11.75T.

Authors:  Sascha Köhler; Karl-Heinz Hiller; Mark Griswold; Wolfgang R Bauer; Axel Haase; Peter M Jakob
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  Super-parallel MR microscope.

Authors:  Yoshimasa Matsuda; Shin Utsuzawa; Takeaki Kurimoto; Tomoyuki Haishi; Yukako Yamazaki; Katsumi Kose; Izumi Anno; Mitsuhiro Marutani
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  In vivo multiple-mouse MRI at 7 Tesla.

Authors:  Nicholas A Bock; Brian J Nieman; Johnathan B Bishop; R Mark Henkelman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  A four-channel time domain multiplexer: a cost-effective alternative to multiple receivers.

Authors:  J R Porter; S M Wright; N Famili
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  In vivo multiple-mouse imaging at 1.5 T.

Authors:  S Xu; T P F Gade; C Matei; K Zakian; A A Alfieri; X Hu; E C Holland; S Soghomonian; J Tjuvajev; D Ballon; J A Koutcher
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 8.  High field MRI in preclinical research.

Authors:  Pasquina Marzola; Francesco Osculati; Andrea Sbarbati
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.528

9.  High-resolution longitudinal screening with magnetic resonance imaging in a murine brain cancer model.

Authors:  Nicholas A Bock; Gelareh Zadeh; Lori M Davidson; Baoping Qian; John G Sled; Abhijit Guha; R Mark Henkelman
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.715

10.  Multiple-mouse MRI.

Authors:  Nicholas A Bock; Norman B Konyer; R Mark Henkelman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Small animal imaging with magnetic resonance microscopy.

Authors:  Bastiaan Driehuys; John Nouls; Alexandra Badea; Elizabeth Bucholz; Ketan Ghaghada; Alexandra Petiet; Laurence W Hedlund
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2008

2.  Applications of 3D printing in small animal magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  John C Nouls; Rohan S Virgincar; Alexander G Culbert; Nathann Morand; Dana W Bobbert; Anne D Yoder; Robert S Schopler; Mustafa R Bashir; Alexandra Badea; Ute Hochgeschwender; Bastiaan Driehuys
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-05-15

3.  Multiple-mouse MRI with multiple arrays of receive coils.

Authors:  Marc S Ramirez; Emilio Esparza-Coss; James A Bankson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Feasibility of multianimal hyperpolarized (13) C MRS.

Authors:  Marc S Ramirez; Jaehyuk Lee; Christopher M Walker; Yunyun Chen; Charles V Kingsley; Jorge De La Cerda; Kiersten L Maldonado; Stephen Y Lai; James A Bankson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Magnetic resonance image enhancement by reducing receptors' effective size and enabling multiple channel acquisition.

Authors:  Fernando Yepes-Calderon; Adriana Velasquez; Natasha Lepore; Olivier Beuf
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2014

6.  INTERCOMPARISON OF PERFORMANCE OF RF COIL GEOMETRIES FOR HIGH FIELD MOUSE CARDIAC MRI.

Authors:  Christakis Constantinides; S Angeli; S Gkagkarellis; G Cofer
Journal:  Concepts Magn Reson Part A Bridg Educ Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 0.481

7.  Comparison of SNR and CNR for in vivo mouse brain imaging at 3 and 7 T using well matched scanner configurations.

Authors:  M W DiFrancesco; J M Rasmussen; W Yuan; R Pratt; S Dunn; B J Dardzinski; S K Holland
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 8.  Monitoring cartilage tissue engineering using magnetic resonance spectroscopy, imaging, and elastography.

Authors:  Mrignayani Kotecha; Dieter Klatt; Richard L Magin
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 6.389

9.  Inside out: modern imaging techniques to reveal animal anatomy.

Authors:  Henrik Lauridsen; Kasper Hansen; Tobias Wang; Peter Agger; Jonas L Andersen; Peter S Knudsen; Anne S Rasmussen; Lars Uhrenholt; Michael Pedersen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Computational morphometry for detecting changes in brain structure due to development, aging, learning, disease and evolution.

Authors:  Daniel Mietchen; Christian Gaser
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 4.081

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.