Olivier Beuf1, Franck Jaillon, Hervé Saint-Jalmes. 1. Laboratoire de RMN, CNRS UMR 5012, Université Lyon1, ESCPE, 43 Boulevard du 11 Novembre 1918, 69616 Villeurbanne, France. olivier.beuf@univ-lyon1.fr
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of phantom and rat brain images performed at 1.5 T on a clinical MR system and at 7 T on a small-animal experimental system. Comparison was carried out by taking into account SNR values based on a single sample acquisition at 1.5 and 7 T as well as on simultaneous imaging of multiple samples at 1.5 T. METHODS: SNR was experimentally assessed on a phantom and rat brains at 1.5 and 7 T using 25 mm surface coils and compared to theoretical SNR gain estimations. The feasibility of multiple-animal imaging, using the hardware capabilities available on the 1.5 T system, was demonstrated. Finally, rat brain images obtained on a single animal at 7 T and on multiple animals acquired simultaneously at 1.5 T were compared. RESULTS: Experimentally determined SNR at 7 T was far below theoretical estimations. Taking into account chemical shift, susceptibility artifacts and modifications of T1 and T2 relaxation times at higher field, a 7-T system holds limited advantage over a 1.5-T system. Instead, a multiple-animal acquisition methodology was demonstrated on a clinical 1.5-T scanner. This acquisition method significantly increases imaging efficiency and competes with single animal acquisitions at higher field. CONCLUSION: Multiple-animal imaging using a standard clinical scanner has a great potential as a high-throughput acquisition method for small animals.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of phantom and rat brain images performed at 1.5 T on a clinical MR system and at 7 T on a small-animal experimental system. Comparison was carried out by taking into account SNR values based on a single sample acquisition at 1.5 and 7 T as well as on simultaneous imaging of multiple samples at 1.5 T. METHODS: SNR was experimentally assessed on a phantom and rat brains at 1.5 and 7 T using 25 mm surface coils and compared to theoretical SNR gain estimations. The feasibility of multiple-animal imaging, using the hardware capabilities available on the 1.5 T system, was demonstrated. Finally, rat brain images obtained on a single animal at 7 T and on multiple animals acquired simultaneously at 1.5 T were compared. RESULTS: Experimentally determined SNR at 7 T was far below theoretical estimations. Taking into account chemical shift, susceptibility artifacts and modifications of T1 and T2 relaxation times at higher field, a 7-T system holds limited advantage over a 1.5-T system. Instead, a multiple-animal acquisition methodology was demonstrated on a clinical 1.5-T scanner. This acquisition method significantly increases imaging efficiency and competes with single animal acquisitions at higher field. CONCLUSION: Multiple-animal imaging using a standard clinical scanner has a great potential as a high-throughput acquisition method for small animals.
Authors: Sascha Köhler; Karl-Heinz Hiller; Mark Griswold; Wolfgang R Bauer; Axel Haase; Peter M Jakob Journal: J Magn Reson Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: S Xu; T P F Gade; C Matei; K Zakian; A A Alfieri; X Hu; E C Holland; S Soghomonian; J Tjuvajev; D Ballon; J A Koutcher Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Nicholas A Bock; Gelareh Zadeh; Lori M Davidson; Baoping Qian; John G Sled; Abhijit Guha; R Mark Henkelman Journal: Neoplasia Date: 2003 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.715
Authors: Bastiaan Driehuys; John Nouls; Alexandra Badea; Elizabeth Bucholz; Ketan Ghaghada; Alexandra Petiet; Laurence W Hedlund Journal: ILAR J Date: 2008
Authors: John C Nouls; Rohan S Virgincar; Alexander G Culbert; Nathann Morand; Dana W Bobbert; Anne D Yoder; Robert S Schopler; Mustafa R Bashir; Alexandra Badea; Ute Hochgeschwender; Bastiaan Driehuys Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2019-05-15
Authors: Marc S Ramirez; Jaehyuk Lee; Christopher M Walker; Yunyun Chen; Charles V Kingsley; Jorge De La Cerda; Kiersten L Maldonado; Stephen Y Lai; James A Bankson Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-06-05 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Christakis Constantinides; S Angeli; S Gkagkarellis; G Cofer Journal: Concepts Magn Reson Part A Bridg Educ Res Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 0.481
Authors: Henrik Lauridsen; Kasper Hansen; Tobias Wang; Peter Agger; Jonas L Andersen; Peter S Knudsen; Anne S Rasmussen; Lars Uhrenholt; Michael Pedersen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-03-22 Impact factor: 3.240