Literature DB >> 14526169

Common fragile sites.

M F Arlt1, A M Casper, T W Glover.   

Abstract

Aphidicolin-induced common fragile sites are site-specific gaps or breaks seen on metaphase chromosomes after partial inhibition of DNA synthesis. These fragile sites were first recognized during the early studies of the fragile X syndrome and are induced by the same conditions of folate or thymidylate stress used to induce the fragile X site. Common fragile sites are normally stable in cultured human cells. However, following induction with replication inhibitors, they display a number of characteristics of unstable and highly recombinogenic DNA. From the many studies that have cloned and characterized fragile sites, it is now known that these sites extend over large regions, are associated with genes, exhibit late or delayed replication, and contain regions of high flexibility but are otherwise unremarkable in sequence. Studies showing that fragile sites and their associated genes are frequently deleted or rearranged in cancer cells have clearly demonstrated their importance in genome instability in tumorigenesis. Yet until recently, very little was known about the molecular mechanisms involved in their stability. Recent findings showing that the key checkpoint genes ATR and BRCA1 are critical for genome stability at fragile sites have shed new light on these mechanisms and on the biological significance of common fragile sites. Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14526169     DOI: 10.1159/000072843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res        ISSN: 1424-8581            Impact factor:   1.636


  47 in total

1.  Linking stem cells to chromosomal instability.

Authors:  Karel H M van Wely; Carlos Martínez-A
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 8.110

Review 2.  Chromosomal rearrangements and microRNAs: a new cancer link with clinical implications.

Authors:  George A Calin; Carlo M Croce
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Homologous recombination and nonhomologous end-joining repair pathways regulate fragile site stability.

Authors:  Michal Schwartz; Eitan Zlotorynski; Michal Goldberg; Efrat Ozeri; Ayelet Rahat; Carlos le Sage; Benjamin P C Chen; David J Chen; Reuven Agami; Batsheva Kerem
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  Premature condensation induces breaks at the interface of early and late replicating chromosome bands bearing common fragile sites.

Authors:  Eliane El Achkar; Michelle Gerbault-Seureau; Martine Muleris; Bernard Dutrillaux; Michelle Debatisse
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Common fragile sites are conserved features of human and mouse chromosomes and relate to large active genes.

Authors:  Anne Helmrich; Karen Stout-Weider; Klaus Hermann; Evelin Schrock; Thomas Heiden
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  A deletion at the mouse Xist gene exposes trans-effects that alter the heterochromatin of the inactive X chromosome and the replication time and DNA stability of both X chromosomes.

Authors:  Silvia V Diaz-Perez; David O Ferguson; Chen Wang; Gyorgyi Csankovszki; Chengming Wang; Shih-Chang Tsai; Devkanya Dutta; Vanessa Perez; SunMin Kim; C Daniel Eller; Jennifer Salstrom; Yan Ouyang; Michael A Teitell; Bernhard Kaltenboeck; Andrew Chess; Sui Huang; York Marahrens
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  MUS81 promotes common fragile site expression.

Authors:  Songmin Ying; Sheroy Minocherhomji; Kok Lung Chan; Timea Palmai-Pallag; Wai Kit Chu; Theresa Wass; Hocine W Mankouri; Ying Liu; Ian D Hickson
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2013-06-30       Impact factor: 28.824

8.  ZNF365 promotes stalled replication forks recovery to maintain genome stability.

Authors:  Yuqing Zhang; Eunmi Park; Christopher S Kim; Ji-hye Paik
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 9.  DNA replication timing, genome stability and cancer: late and/or delayed DNA replication timing is associated with increased genomic instability.

Authors:  Nathan Donley; Mathew J Thayer
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 15.707

10.  microRNA-based cancer cell reprogramming technology.

Authors:  Shimpei Nishikawa; Hideshi Ishii; Naotsugu Haraguchi; Yoshihiro Kano; Takahito Fukusumi; Katsuya Ohta; Miyuki Ozaki; Dyah Laksmi Dewi; Daisuke Sakai; Taroh Satoh; Hiroaki Nagano; Yuichiro Doki; Masaki Mori
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.