Literature DB >> 17039484

Identification of the human/mouse syntenic common fragile site FRA7K/Fra12C1--relation of FRA7K and other human common fragile sites on chromosome 7 to evolutionary breakpoints.

Anne Helmrich1, Karen Stout-Weider, Anja Matthaei, Klaus Hermann, Thomas Heiden, Evelin Schrock.   

Abstract

Common fragile sites (CFSs) are expressed as chromosome gaps in cells of different species including human and mouse as a result of the inhibition of DNA replication. They may serve as hot spots for DNA breakage in processes such as tumorigenesis and chromosome evolution. Using multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization mapping, the authors describe here human CFS FRA7K on chromosome band 7q31.1 and its murine homolog Fra12C1. Within the syntenic FRA7K/Fra12C1 region lies the IMMP2L/Immp2l gene with a size of 899/983 kb. The authors further mapped 2 amplification breakpoints of the breast cancer cell line SKBR3 to the CFSs FRA7G and FRA7H. The 5 molecularly defined CFSs on chromosome 7 do not preferentially colocalize with synteny breaks between the human and mouse genomes and with intragenomic duplications that have occurred during chromosome evolution. In addition, in contrast to all currently reported data, CFSs in chromosome band 7q31 do not show increased DNA helix flexibility in comparison with control regions without CFS expression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17039484     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.22049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  13 in total

1.  Genomic rearrangements at the FRA2H common fragile site frequently involve non-homologous recombination events across LTR and L1(LINE) repeats.

Authors:  Lena M Brueckner; Evgeny Sagulenko; Elisa M Hess; Diana Zheglo; Anne Blumrich; Manfred Schwab; Larissa Savelyeva
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Common fragile sites are conserved features of human and mouse chromosomes and relate to large active genes.

Authors:  Anne Helmrich; Karen Stout-Weider; Klaus Hermann; Evelin Schrock; Thomas Heiden
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 3.  Molecular characterization of common fragile sites as a strategy to discover cancer susceptibility genes.

Authors:  Larissa Savelyeva; Lena M Brueckner
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 9.261

4.  A genome-wide analysis of common fragile sites: what features determine chromosomal instability in the human genome?

Authors:  Arkarachai Fungtammasan; Erin Walsh; Francesca Chiaromonte; Kristin A Eckert; Kateryna D Makova
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 5.  Are common fragile sites merely structural domains or highly organized "functional" units susceptible to oncogenic stress?

Authors:  Alexandros G Georgakilas; Petros Tsantoulis; Athanassios Kotsinas; Ioannis Michalopoulos; Paul Townsend; Vassilis G Gorgoulis
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 9.261

6.  Gene synteny comparisons between different vertebrates provide new insights into breakage and fusion events during mammalian karyotype evolution.

Authors:  Claus Kemkemer; Matthias Kohn; David N Cooper; Lutz Froenicke; Josef Högel; Horst Hameister; Hildegard Kehrer-Sawatzki
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  The role of DNA damage response pathways in chromosome fragility in Fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Daman Kumari; Valentina Somma; Asako J Nakamura; William M Bonner; Ettoré D'Ambrosio; Karen Usdin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 8.  Common fragile sites: genomic hotspots of DNA damage and carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Ke Ma; Li Qiu; Kristin Mrasek; Jun Zhang; Thomas Liehr; Luciana Gonçalves Quintana; Zheng Li
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 6.208

9.  MiRNAs Targeting Double Strand DNA Repair Pathways Lurk in Genomically Unstable Rare Fragile Sites and Determine Cancer Outcomes.

Authors:  Stephan Marquardt; Christin Richter; Brigitte M Pützer; Stella Logotheti
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  SUMO2 conjugation of PCNA facilitates chromatin remodeling to resolve transcription-replication conflicts.

Authors:  Min Li; Xiaohua Xu; Chou-Wei Chang; Li Zheng; Binghui Shen; Yilun Liu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.