Literature DB >> 12874785

Characterization of FRA6E and its potential role in autosomal recessive juvenile parkinsonism and ovarian cancer.

Stacy R Denison1, Gwen Callahan, Nicole A Becker, Leslie A Phillips, David I Smith.   

Abstract

Characterization of FRA6E (6q26), the third most frequently observed common fragile site (CFS) in the human population, determined that aphidicolin-induced instability at FRA6E extends over a very large region (3.6 Mb). Sequence analysis identified eight genes (IGF2R, SLC22A1, SLC22A2, SLC22A3, PLG, LPA, MAP3K4, and PARK2) as mapping within the large FRA6E region. PARK2, the gene associated with autosomal recessive juvenile parkinsonism (ARJP), accounts for more than half of the CFS. Homozygous deletions and large heterozygous deletions have been observed in PARK2 in ARJP patients. RT-PCR analysis of the eight genes localizing to FRA6E indicated that 50% of the genes, including PARK2, were down-regulated in one or more of the primary ovarian tumors analyzed. PARK2 expression was down-regulated in 60.0% of the primary ovarian tumors analyzed. Additionally, we found tumor-specific alternative transcripts of PARK2. Loss of heterozygosity analysis of primary ovarian tumors by use of polymorphic markers in the 6q26 region demonstrated 72% LOH in the center of the PARK2 gene, the highest of any of the markers tested. FRA6E shares many similarities with FRA3B (3p14.2) and FRA16D (16q23.2) in representing a large region of genomic instability and containing an extremely large gene that may play a role in the development of ovarian and many other cancers. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12874785     DOI: 10.1002/gcc.10236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer        ISSN: 1045-2257            Impact factor:   5.006


  48 in total

Review 1.  Mitochondrial dysfunction in Parkinson's disease: molecular mechanisms and pathophysiological consequences.

Authors:  Nicole Exner; Anne Kathrin Lutz; Christian Haass; Konstanze F Winklhofer
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Homologous recombination and nonhomologous end-joining repair pathways regulate fragile site stability.

Authors:  Michal Schwartz; Eitan Zlotorynski; Michal Goldberg; Efrat Ozeri; Ayelet Rahat; Carlos le Sage; Benjamin P C Chen; David J Chen; Reuven Agami; Batsheva Kerem
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Premature condensation induces breaks at the interface of early and late replicating chromosome bands bearing common fragile sites.

Authors:  Eliane El Achkar; Michelle Gerbault-Seureau; Martine Muleris; Bernard Dutrillaux; Michelle Debatisse
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Common fragile sites are conserved features of human and mouse chromosomes and relate to large active genes.

Authors:  Anne Helmrich; Karen Stout-Weider; Klaus Hermann; Evelin Schrock; Thomas Heiden
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Incorporating inter-relationships between different levels of genomic data into cancer clinical outcome prediction.

Authors:  Dokyoon Kim; Hyunjung Shin; Kyung-Ah Sohn; Anurag Verma; Marylyn D Ritchie; Ju Han Kim
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.608

6.  Role of inflammatory related gene expression in clear cell renal cell carcinoma development and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Weiqi Tan; Michelle A T Hildebrandt; Xia Pu; Maosheng Huang; Jie Lin; Surena F Matin; Pheroze Tamboli; Christopher G Wood; Xifeng Wu
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  An emerging role of PARK2 in cancer.

Authors:  Liang Xu; De-chen Lin; Dong Yin; H Phillip Koeffler
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 4.599

8.  Identification of the human homolog of the imprinted mouse Air non-coding RNA.

Authors:  Iveta Y Yotova; Irena M Vlatkovic; Florian M Pauler; Katarzyna E Warczok; Peter F Ambros; Mitsuo Oshimura; Hans-Christian Theussl; Manfred Gessler; Erwin F Wagner; Denise P Barlow
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 5.736

9.  Gene synteny comparisons between different vertebrates provide new insights into breakage and fusion events during mammalian karyotype evolution.

Authors:  Claus Kemkemer; Matthias Kohn; David N Cooper; Lutz Froenicke; Josef Högel; Horst Hameister; Hildegard Kehrer-Sawatzki
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  The role of DNA damage response pathways in chromosome fragility in Fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Daman Kumari; Valentina Somma; Asako J Nakamura; William M Bonner; Ettoré D'Ambrosio; Karen Usdin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.