Literature DB >> 16943559

Lighter or heavier than predicted: neural correlates of corrective mechanisms during erroneously programmed lifts.

Per Jenmalm1, Christina Schmitz, Hans Forssberg, H Henrik Ehrsson.   

Abstract

A central concept in neuroscience is that the CNS signals the sensory discrepancy between the predicted and actual sensory consequences of action. It has been proposed that the cerebellum and parietal cortex are involved in this process. A discrepancy will trigger preprogrammed corrective responses and update the engaged sensorimotor memories. Here we use functional magnetic resonance imaging with an event-related design to investigate the neuronal correlates of such discrepancies. Healthy adults repeatedly lifted an object between their right index fingers and thumbs, and on some lifting trials, the weight of the object was unpredictably changed between light (230 g) and heavy (830 g). Regardless of whether the weight was heavier or lighter than predicted, activity was found in the right inferior parietal cortex (supramarginal gyrus). This suggests that this region is involved in the comparison of the predicted and actual sensory input and the updating of the sensorimotor memories. When the object was lighter or heavier than predicted, two different types of preprogrammed force corrections occurred. There was a slow force increase when the weight of the object was heavier than predicted. This corrective response was associated with activity in the left primary motor and somatosensory cortices. The fast termination of the excessive force when the object was lighter than predicted activated the right cerebellum. These findings show how the parietal cortex, cerebellum, and motor cortex are involved in the signaling of the discrepancy between predicated and actual sensory feedback and the associated corrective mechanisms.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16943559      PMCID: PMC6675347          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5045-05.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  43 in total

Review 1.  Computational principles of movement neuroscience.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; Z Ghahramani
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Illusory arm movements activate cortical motor areas: a positron emission tomography study.

Authors:  E Naito; H H Ehrsson; S Geyer; K Zilles; P E Roland
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning.

Authors:  M Kawato
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  A multimodal cortical network for the detection of changes in the sensory environment.

Authors:  J Downar; A P Crawley; D J Mikulis; K D Davis
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Cortical activity in precision- versus power-grip tasks: an fMRI study.

Authors:  H H Ehrsson; A Fagergren; T Jonsson; G Westling; R S Johansson; H Forssberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The cerebellum is involved in predicting the sensory consequences of action.

Authors:  S J Blakemore; C D Frith; D M Wolpert
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-07-03       Impact factor: 1.837

7.  Differential fronto-parietal activation depending on force used in a precision grip task: an fMRI study.

Authors:  H H Ehrsson; E Fagergren; H Forssberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Relationship between the activity of precentral neurones during active and passive movements in conscious monkeys.

Authors:  R N Lemon; J A Hanby; R Porter
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1976-10-29

9.  The inferior parietal lobule is the target of output from the superior colliculus, hippocampus, and cerebellum.

Authors:  D M Clower; R A West; J C Lynch; P L Strick
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  A fronto-parietal circuit for object manipulation in man: evidence from an fMRI-study.

Authors:  F Binkofski; G Buccino; S Posse; R J Seitz; G Rizzolatti; H Freund
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.386

View more
  38 in total

1.  Dissociation of brain areas associated with force production and stabilization during manipulation of unstable objects.

Authors:  Linda Holmström; Orjan de Manzano; Brigitte Vollmer; Lea Forsman; Francisco J Valero-Cuevas; Fredrik Ullén; Hans Forssberg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Information about the weight of grasped objects from vision and internal models interacts within the primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Morrison N Loh; Louise Kirsch; John C Rothwell; Roger N Lemon; Marco Davare
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  fMRI investigation of unexpected somatosensory feedback perturbation during speech.

Authors:  Elisa Golfinopoulos; Jason A Tourville; Jason W Bohland; Satrajit S Ghosh; Alfonso Nieto-Castanon; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Weight lifting in the human brain.

Authors:  Floris P de Lange
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Neurophysiology of prehension. II. Response diversity in primary somatosensory (S-I) and motor (M-I) cortices.

Authors:  Esther P Gardner; Jin Y Ro; K Srinivasa Babu; Soumya Ghosh
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Relation between muscle and brain activity during isometric contractions of the first dorsal interosseus muscle.

Authors:  Hiske van Duinen; Remco Renken; Natasha M Maurits; Inge Zijdewind
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Failure to disrupt the 'sensorimotor' memory for lifting objects with a precision grip.

Authors:  Kelly J Cole; Martin Potash; Clayton Peterson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The neural substrate for working memory of tactile surface texture.

Authors:  Amanda L Kaas; Hanneke van Mier; Maya Visser; Rainer Goebel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Lifting a familiar object: visual size analysis, not memory for object weight, scales lift force.

Authors:  Kelly J Cole
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Selective regions of the visuomotor system are related to gain-induced changes in force error.

Authors:  Stephen A Coombes; Daniel M Corcos; Lisa Sprute; David E Vaillancourt
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.