Literature DB >> 17717654

Failure to disrupt the 'sensorimotor' memory for lifting objects with a precision grip.

Kelly J Cole1, Martin Potash, Clayton Peterson.   

Abstract

When repetitively lifting an object with mechanical properties that vary from lift-to-lift, the fingertip forces for gripping and lifting are influenced strongly by the previous lift, revealing a 'sensorimotor' memory. Two recent reports indicate that the sensorimotor memory for grip force is easily disrupted by an unrelated task like a strong pinch or vibration, even when the lift was performed with the hand contralateral to the vibration or preceding pinch. These findings indicate that this memory may reflect sensory input or muscle contraction levels, rather than object properties or the specific task of gripping and lifting. Here we report that the predictive scaling of lift force was not disrupted by conditioning tasks that featured exerting a vertical isometric force with the upper extremity. When subjects lifted a 2 N object repetitively the peak lift force rate was 26.4 N/s. The lift force rate increased to 36.1 N/s when the 2 N object was lifted (regardless of hand) after lifting the 8 N object with the right hand, which reveals the expected 'sensorimotor' memory. The lift force rate did not increase (24.8 vs. 26.4 N/s for the control condition) when a bout of isometric exertion (9.8 N) in the vertical direction with the distal right forearm preceded lifts of the 2 N object. This finding was confirmed with another isometric task designed to more closely mimic lifting an object with a precision grip. This difference in the sensitivity of grip versus lift force to a preceding isometric contraction indicates that separate sensorimotor memories contribute to the predictive scaling of the commands for gripping and lifting an object.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17717654     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1088-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  31 in total

1.  Responses of cerebellar interpositus neurons to predictable perturbations applied to an object held in a precision grip.

Authors:  Joël Monzée; Allan M Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-12-17       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Evidence for the involvement of the posterior parietal cortex in coordination of fingertip forces for grasp stability in manipulation.

Authors:  H Henrik Ehrsson; Anders Fagergren; Roland S Johansson; Hans Forssberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Purkinje cell simple spike activity during grasping and lifting objects of different textures and weights.

Authors:  E Espinoza; A M Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Neuronal activity in somatosensory cortex of monkeys using a precision grip. II. Responses To object texture and weights.

Authors:  I Salimi; T Brochier; A M Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Visual size cues in the programming of manipulative forces during precision grip.

Authors:  A M Gordon; H Forssberg; R S Johansson; G Westling
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Widespread access to predictive models in the motor system: a short review.

Authors:  Paul R Davidson; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2005-08-31       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  Human brain activity in the control of fine static precision grip forces: an fMRI study.

Authors:  J P Kuhtz-Buschbeck; H H Ehrsson; H Forssberg
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Memory representations underlying motor commands used during manipulation of common and novel objects.

Authors:  A M Gordon; G Westling; K J Cole; R S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Formation and lateralization of internal representations underlying motor commands during precision grip.

Authors:  A M Gordon; H Forssberg; N Iwasaki
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Development of human precision grip. I: Basic coordination of force.

Authors:  H Forssberg; A C Eliasson; H Kinoshita; R S Johansson; G Westling
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  6 in total

1.  Collision error avoidance: influence of proportion congruency and sensorimotor memory on open-loop grasp control.

Authors:  Ryan Brydges; Adam Dubrowski
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Somatosensory feedback refines the perception of hand shape with respect to external constraints.

Authors:  S A Winges
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Modulation of finger muscle activation patterns across postures is coordinated across all muscle groups.

Authors:  Sang Wook Lee; Dan Qiu; Heidi C Fischer; Megan O Conrad; Derek G Kamper
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Transfer and generalization of learned manipulation between unimanual and bimanual tasks.

Authors:  Trevor Lee-Miller; Marco Santello; Andrew M Gordon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Sensorimotor Memory Biases Weight Perception During Object Lifting.

Authors:  Vonne van Polanen; Marco Davare
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Cold and heavy: grasping the temperature-weight illusion.

Authors:  Johann P Kuhtz-Buschbeck; Johanna Hagenkamp
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 1.972

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.