Literature DB >> 10407049

Illusory arm movements activate cortical motor areas: a positron emission tomography study.

E Naito1, H H Ehrsson, S Geyer, K Zilles, P E Roland.   

Abstract

Vibration at approximately 70 Hz on the biceps tendon elicits a vivid illusory arm extension. Nobody has examined which areas in the brain are activated when subjects perceive this kinesthetic illusion. The illusion was hypothesized to originate from activations of somatosensory areas normally engaged in kinesthesia. The locations of the microstructurally defined cytoarchitectonic areas of the primary motor (4a and 4p) and primary somatosensory cortex (3a, 3b, and 1) were obtained from population maps of these areas in standard anatomical format. The regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) was measured with (15)O-butanol and positron emission tomography in nine subjects. The left biceps tendon was vibrated at 10 Hz (LOW), at 70 or 80 Hz (ILLUSION), or at 220 or 240 Hz (HIGH). A REST condition with eyes closed was included in addition. Only the 70 and 80 Hz vibrations elicited strong illusory arm extensions in all subjects without any electromyographic activity in the arm muscles. When the rCBF of the ILLUSION condition was contrasted to the LOW and HIGH conditions, we found two clusters of activations, one in the supplementary motor area (SMA) extending into the caudal cingulate motor area (CMAc) and the other in area 4a extending into the dorsal premotor cortex (PMd) and area 4p. When LOW, HIGH, and ILLUSION were contrasted to REST, giving the main effect of vibration, areas 4p, 3b, and 1, the frontal and parietal operculum, and the insular cortex were activated. Thus, with the exception of area 4p, the effects of vibration and illusion were associated with disparate cortical areas. This indicates that the SMA, CMAc, PMd, and area 4a were activated associated with the kinesthetic illusion. Thus, against our expectations, motor areas rather than somatosensory areas seem to convey the illusion of limb movement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10407049      PMCID: PMC6783063     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  92 in total

1.  Rapid automated algorithm for aligning and reslicing PET images.

Authors:  R P Woods; S R Cherry; J C Mazziotta
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Two different areas within the primary motor cortex of man.

Authors:  S Geyer; A Ledberg; A Schleicher; S Kinomura; T Schormann; U Bürgel; T Klingberg; J Larsson; K Zilles; P E Roland
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-08-29       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Effects on muscle activity from microstimuli applied to somatosensory and motor cortex during voluntary movement in the monkey.

Authors:  G L Widener; P D Cheney
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Ago-antagonist muscle spindle inputs contribute together to joint movement coding in man.

Authors:  E Ribot-Ciscar; J P Roll
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1998-04-27       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Interactions between visual and muscular information in illusions of limb movement.

Authors:  M F Tardy-Gervet; J C Gilhodes; J P Roll
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Skin strain patterns provide kinaesthetic information to the human central nervous system.

Authors:  B B Edin; N Johansson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1995-08-15       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Receptive field characteristics of tactile units with myelinated afferents in hairy skin of human subjects.

Authors:  A B Vallbo; H Olausson; J Wessberg; N Kakuda
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1995-03-15       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Peripheral afferent inputs to the forelimb area of the monkey motor cortex: input-output relations.

Authors:  I Rosén; H Asanuma
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Proprioceptive guidance of human voluntary wrist movements studied using muscle vibration.

Authors:  F W Cody; M P Schwartz; G P Smit
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Kinaesthetic role of muscle afferents in man, studied by tendon vibration and microneurography.

Authors:  J P Roll; J P Vedel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  70 in total

1.  The effect of long-term TENS on persistent neuroplastic changes in the human cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Raf L J Meesen; Koen Cuypers; John C Rothwell; Stephan P Swinnen; Oron Levin
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Frequency-dependent effects of muscle tendon vibration on corticospinal excitability: a TMS study.

Authors:  M Steyvers; O Levin; S M Verschueren; S P Swinnen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  High-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation of the supplementary motor area reduces bimanual coupling during anti-phase but not in-phase movements.

Authors:  Maarten Steyvers; Seiji Etoh; Dieter Sauner; Oron Levin; Hartwig R Siebner; Stephan P Swinnen; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-20       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Memory for fingertip forces: passive hand muscle vibration interferes with predictive grip force scaling.

Authors:  Dennis A Nowak; Karin Rosenkranz; Joachim Hermsdörfer; John Rothwell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Somatosensory areas engaged during discrimination of steady pressure, spring strength, and kinesthesia.

Authors:  Anna Bodegård; Stefan Geyer; Priyantha Herath; Christian Grefkes; Karl Zilles; Per E Roland
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 6.  Optimal feedback control and the long-latency stretch response.

Authors:  J Andrew Pruszynski; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The illusion of changed position and movement from vibrating one arm is altered by vision or movement of the other arm.

Authors:  Masahiko Izumizaki; Mikio Tsuge; Lena Akai; Uwe Proske; Ikuo Homma
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Proprioceptive feedback in humans expresses motor invariants during writing.

Authors:  Frederic Albert; Edith Ribot-Ciscar; Michel Fiocchi; Mikael Bergenheim; Jean-Pierre Roll
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-04-27       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Effect of slow, small movement on the vibration-evoked kinesthetic illusion.

Authors:  P J Cordo; V S Gurfinkel; S Brumagne; C Flores-Vieira
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-20       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Activation shift in elderly subjects across functional systems: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Christian Roski; Svenja Caspers; Silke Lux; Felix Hoffstaedter; René Bergs; Katrin Amunts; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.270

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.