Literature DB >> 18567592

Auditory reality and self-assessment of hearing.

William Noble1.   

Abstract

Analyses are made of three problem areas in the realm of hearing disorder and its management, all of which are cogently informed by self-assessment: (a) prosthetic technology and the auditory ecology, (b) dimensions of benefit from amplification, and (c) dimensions of disability. Technology and ecology addresses the matter of "fitness for purpose" of different prosthetic schemes, moderated by people's hearing and listening environments (ecologies) and by what they bring to the task of hearing and listening. Dimensions of benefit covers what is achievable with prevailing technology, and also what people are aware of and identify as their needs. Dimensions of disability examines what has been recently learned about the range of hearing functions that need attending to in management of impaired hearing. A closing section provides a portrait of "auditory reality," whose characteristics may be better appreciated when analyzed in contrast to and comparison with "visual reality."

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18567592      PMCID: PMC4111426          DOI: 10.1177/1084713808316172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Amplif        ISSN: 1084-7138


  20 in total

1.  Effects of bilateral versus unilateral hearing aid fitting on abilities measured by the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ).

Authors:  William Noble; Stuart Gatehouse
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 2.  Bilateral hearing aids: a review of self-reports of benefit in comparison with unilateral fitting.

Authors:  William Noble
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 3.  Perceptual consequences of cochlear hearing loss and their implications for the design of hearing aids.

Authors:  B C Moore
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Optimizing sound localization with hearing AIDS.

Authors:  D Byrne; W Noble
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1998-06

5.  Attitude and help-seeking for hearing impairment.

Authors:  R H van den Brink; H P Wit; G I Kempen; M J van Heuvelen
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1996-10

6.  Components and determinants of hearing aid benefit.

Authors:  S Gatehouse
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Who prompts patients to consult about hearing loss?

Authors:  C F Mahoney; S D Stephens; B A Cadge
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1996-06

Review 8.  Noise, amplification, and compression: considerations of three main issues in hearing aid design.

Authors:  R Plomp
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Two-eared listening in dynamic situations.

Authors:  Stuart Gatehouse; Michael Akeroyd
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.117

10.  The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ).

Authors:  Stuart Gatehouse; William Noble
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.117

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on visually guided attention in a multitalker environment.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Nicole Marrone; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-11-14

Review 2.  Community-Based Participatory Research and Human-Centered Design Principles to Advance Hearing Health Equity.

Authors:  Nicole L Marrone; Carrie L Nieman; Laura Coco
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 3.562

3.  Individual Hearing Aid Benefit in Real Life Evaluated Using Ecological Momentary Assessment.

Authors:  Petra von Gablenz; Ulrik Kowalk; Jörg Bitzer; Markus Meis; Inga Holube
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.