Literature DB >> 9873906

Demonstration of accuracy and clinical versatility of mutual information for automatic multimodality image fusion using affine and thin-plate spline warped geometric deformations.

C R Meyer1, J L Boes, B Kim, P H Bland, K R Zasadny, P V Kison, K Koral, K A Frey, R L Wahl.   

Abstract

This paper applies and evaluates an automatic mutual information-based registration algorithm across a broad spectrum of multimodal volume data sets. The algorithm requires little or no pre-processing, minimal user input and easily implements either affine, i.e. linear or thin-plate spline (TPS) warped registrations. We have evaluated the algorithm in phantom studies as well as in selected cases where few other algorithms could perform as well, if at all, to demonstrate the value of this new method. Pairs of multimodal gray-scale volume data sets were registered by iteratively changing registration parameters to maximize mutual information. Quantitative registration errors were assessed in registrations of a thorax phantom using PET/CT and in the National Library of Medicine's Visible Male using MRI T2-/T1-weighted acquisitions. Registrations of diverse clinical data sets were demonstrated including rotate-translate mapping of PET/MRI brain scans with significant missing data, full affine mapping of thoracic PET/CT and rotate-translate mapping of abdominal SPECT/CT. A five-point thin-plate spline (TPS) warped registration of thoracic PET/CT is also demonstrated. The registration algorithm converged in times ranging between 3.5 and 31 min for affine clinical registrations and 57 min for TPS warping. Mean error vector lengths for rotate-translate registrations were measured to be subvoxel in phantoms. More importantly the rotate-translate algorithm performs well even with missing data. The demonstrated clinical fusions are qualitatively excellent at all levels. We conclude that such automatic, rapid, robust algorithms significantly increase the likelihood that multimodality registrations will be routinely used to aid clinical diagnoses and post-therapeutic assessment in the near future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9873906     DOI: 10.1016/s1361-8415(97)85010-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Anal        ISSN: 1361-8415            Impact factor:   8.545


  94 in total

1.  Evaluation of a semiautomatic 3D fusion technique applied to molecular imaging and MRI brain/frame volume data sets.

Authors:  R J T Gorniak; E L Kramer; G Q Maguire; M E Noz; C J Schettino; M P Zeleznik
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Enhancing accuracy of magnetic resonance image fusion by defining a volume of interest.

Authors:  B M Hoelper; F Soldner; R Lachner; R Behr
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2003-09-02       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  DRAMMS: Deformable registration via attribute matching and mutual-saliency weighting.

Authors:  Yangming Ou; Aristeidis Sotiras; Nikos Paragios; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 8.545

4.  Investigation on tumor hypoxia in resectable primary prostate cancer as demonstrated by 18F-FAZA PET/CT utilizing multimodality fusion techniques.

Authors:  Rita Garcia-Parra; David Wood; Rajal B Shah; Javed Siddiqui; Hero Hussain; Hyunjin Park; Timothy Desmond; Charles Meyer; Morand Piert
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-07-16       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  Structural brain atlases: design, rationale, and applications in normal and pathological cohorts.

Authors:  Pravat K Mandal; Rashima Mahajan; Ivo D Dinov
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 4.472

6.  The functional diffusion map: an imaging biomarker for the early prediction of cancer treatment outcome.

Authors:  Bradford A Moffat; Thomas L Chenevert; Charles R Meyer; Paul E McKeever; Daniel E Hall; Benjamin A Hoff; Timothy D Johnson; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Brian D Ross
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.715

7.  A methodology for registration of a histological slide and in vivo MRI volume based on optimizing mutual information.

Authors:  Charles R Meyer; Bradford A Moffat; Kyle K Kuszpit; Peyton L Bland; Paul E Mckeever; Timothy D Johnson; Thomas L Chenevert; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Brian D Ross
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2006 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 4.488

8.  Joint registration and segmentation of neuroanatomic structures from brain MRI.

Authors:  Fei Wang; Baba C Vemuri; Stephan J Eisenschenk
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Surface fluid registration of conformal representation: application to detect disease burden and genetic influence on hippocampus.

Authors:  Jie Shi; Paul M Thompson; Boris Gutman; Yalin Wang
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Diffusion imaging for therapy response assessment of brain tumor.

Authors:  Thomas L Chenevert; Brian D Ross
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.264

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.