Literature DB >> 27241055

Maps created using a new objective procedure (C-NRT) correlate with behavioral, loudness-balanced maps: a study in adult cochlear implant users.

Alessandro Scorpecci1, Alessandra D'Elia2, Paolo Malerba3, Italo Cantore4, Patrizia Consolino5, Franco Trabalzini6, Gaetano Paludetti7, Nicola Quaranta2.   

Abstract

In uncooperative patients, electrical compound action potential (ECAP) thresholds are reliable in predicting T-levels, but are not in determining the C-level profile. The present study aims to assess if the C-level profile can be predicted by a new objective procedure (C-NRT) which uses the amplitude growth function (AGF) and is based on the assumption that equal ECAP amplitudes elicit equal loudness percepts. This is a correlational study conducted in five tertiary care referral hospitals with 21 post-lingually deaf adult cochlear implant users. Two maps were created: a behavioral, bitonal balanced (BB) map and an objective map, in which T-levels were the same as in the BB map, and C-levels were obtained with C-NRT. C-NRT consisted of performing the AGF of nine electrodes, and of setting the current level eliciting a 100 μV ECAP amplitude as C-level in the map. AutoNRT was also measured. Main outcome measures were correlation between behavioral C-profile level, objective C-profile level, behavioral T-profile level and objective T-profile (AutoNRT) level; disyllabic word recognition scores in quiet and in noise conditions (SNR = + 10 and 0) with both maps. A strong correlation was found between behavioral and C-NRT-derived C-levels (mean per electrode correlation: R = 0.862, p < 0.001). C-NRT could predict behavioral C-levels with a greater accuracy than AutoNRT. Word recognition was significantly better with BB maps only in the quiet condition (p = 0.002). C-NRT is more accurate than AutoNRT in predicting the C-level profile in adult cochlear implant users. This finding encourages future application in uncooperative patients, especially in very young children.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amplitude growth; Cochlear implant; Map; Objective

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27241055     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-016-4115-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  24 in total

1.  Comparison of EAP thresholds with MAP levels in the nucleus 24 cochlear implant: data from children.

Authors:  M L Hughes; C J Brown; P J Abbas; A A Wolaver; J P Gervais
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Preliminary neural response telemetry results.

Authors:  H Cullington
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  2000-06

3.  Speech perception using maps based on neural response telemetry measures.

Authors:  Keely Seyle; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Measurement of the electrically evoked compound action potential via a neural response telemetry system.

Authors:  Norbert Dillier; Wai Kong Lai; Bengt Almqvist; Carolin Frohne; Joachim Müller-Deile; Matthias Stecker; Ernst von Wallenberg
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.547

5.  Speech perception in nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users with processor settings based on electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds.

Authors:  Guido F Smoorenburg; Christina Willeboer; Johannes E van Dijk
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.854

6.  AutoNR: an automated system that measures ECAP thresholds with the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant via machine intelligence.

Authors:  Andrew Botros; Bas van Dijk; Matthijs Killian
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 5.326

7.  Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T- and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Lisa G Potts; Margaret W Skinner; Brenda D Gotter; Michael J Strube; Chris A Brenner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Neural response telemetry reconsidered: I. The relevance of ECAP threshold profiles and scaled profiles to cochlear implant fitting.

Authors:  Andrew Botros; Colleen Psarros
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  [Bisyllabic words for speech audiometry: a new italian material].

Authors:  M Turrini; F Cutugno; P Maturi; S Prosser; F A Leoni; E Arslan
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.124

10.  Using evoked compound action potentials to assess activation of electrodes and predict C-levels in the Tempo+ cochlear implant speech processor.

Authors:  Isaac Alvarez; Angel de la Torre; Manuel Sainz; Cristina Roldán; Hansjoerg Schoesser; Philipp Spitzer
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  2 in total

1.  Efficacy of using NRT thresholds in cochlear implants fitting, in prelingual pediatric patients.

Authors:  Ahmed Allam; Ahmed Eldegwi
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2019-06-28

2.  Accessing the stapedius muscle via novel surgical retrofacial approach during cochlear implantation surgery: Intraoperative results on feasibility and safety.

Authors:  Orlando Guntinas-Lichius; Dirk Arnold; Gerd Fabian Volk; Daniela Korth; Rene Aschenbach; Johann-Martin Hempel; Fritz Schneider; Thore Schade-Mann; Philipp Gamerdinger; Anke Tropitzsch; Hubert Löwenheim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 3.752

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.