Literature DB >> 1691977

Neuromagnetic evidence of a dynamic excitation pattern generating the N100 auditory response.

R L Rogers1, A C Papanicolaou, S B Baumann, C Saydjari, H M Eisenberg.   

Abstract

Evoked magnetic field recordings were used to localize multiple sources of the negative component of cortical responses to auditory stimuli. The negative cortical component of the auditory evoked response, often called the N100, has traditionally been of interest due to its sensitivity to both stimulation parameters and cognitive variables. Results indicate that this component appears to reflect spreading activation of adjacent cortical columns within the primary projection area of the temporal lobe, extending anteriorly for about 1 cm following the downward slope of the superior surface of the lobe.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1691977     DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(90)90043-d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  13 in total

1.  Intersession replicability of dipole parameters from three components of the auditory evoked magnetic field.

Authors:  S B Baumann; R L Rogers; A C Papanicolaou; C L Saydjari
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Human middle latency auditory evoked magnetic fields.

Authors:  T Yoshiura; S Ueno; K Iramina; K Masuda
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Source analysis of magnetic field responses from the human auditory cortex elicited by short speech sounds.

Authors:  S Kuriki; Y Okita; Y Hirata
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  A neurophysiologically-based mathematical model of flash visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  B H Jansen; G Zouridakis; M E Brandt
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.086

5.  Evidence for multiple generators in evoked responses using finite difference field mapping: auditory evoked fields.

Authors:  J E Moran; N Tepley; G P Jacobson; G L Barkley
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Somatosensory evoked response source localization using actual cortical surface as the spatial constraint.

Authors:  M Akhtari; D McNay; M Mandelkern; B Teeter; H E Cline; J Mallick; G Clark; R Tatar; R Lufkin; K Chan
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.020

7.  Analysis of auditory evoked potential parameters in the presence of radiofrequency fields using a support vector machines method.

Authors:  E Maby; R Le Bouquin Jeannès; C Liégeois-Chauvel; B Gourevitch; G Faucon
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Repeated stimulus exposure alters the way sound is encoded in the human brain.

Authors:  Kelly L Tremblay; Kayo Inoue; Katrina McClannahan; Bernhard Ross
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Hemispheric asymmetry in mid and long latency neuromagnetic responses to single clicks.

Authors:  Mary F Howard; David Poeppel
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Stimulus experience modifies auditory neuromagnetic responses in young and older listeners.

Authors:  Bernhard Ross; Kelly Tremblay
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.