Literature DB >> 8452897

A neurophysiologically-based mathematical model of flash visual evoked potentials.

B H Jansen1, G Zouridakis, M E Brandt.   

Abstract

Evidence is presented that a neurophysiologically-inspired mathematical model, originally developed for the generation of spontaneous EEG (electroencephalogram) activity, can produce VEP (visual evoked potential)-like waveforms when pulse-like signals serve as input. It was found that the simulated VEP activity was mainly due to intracortical excitatory connections rather than direct thalamic input. Also, the model-generated VEPs exhibited similar relationships between prestimulus EEG characteristics and subsequent VEP morphology, as seen in human data. Specifically, the large correlation between the N1 amplitude and the prestimulus alpha phase angle, and the insensitivity of P2 to the latter feature, as observed in actual VEPs to low intensity flashes, was also found in the model-generated data. These findings provide support for the hypothesis that the spontaneous EEG and the VEP are generated by some of the same neural structures and that the VEP is due to distributed activity, rather than dipolar sources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8452897     DOI: 10.1007/bf00224863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Cybern        ISSN: 0340-1200            Impact factor:   2.086


  22 in total

1.  EVOKED RESPONSES RECORDED FROM THE DEPTHS OF THE HUMAN BRAIN.

Authors:  M A BRAZIER
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1964-05-08       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  The effect of the phase of prestimulus alpha activity on the averaged visual evoked response.

Authors:  B H Jansen; M E Brandt
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug

3.  Fluctuations of steady-state VEPs: interaction of driven evoked potentials and the EEG.

Authors:  J Mast; J D Victor
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-05

4.  Excitatory and inhibitory interactions in localized populations of model neurons.

Authors:  H R Wilson; J D Cowan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Model of brain rhythmic activity. The alpha-rhythm of the thalamus.

Authors:  F H Lopes da Silva; A Hoeks; H Smits; L H Zetterberg
Journal:  Kybernetik       Date:  1974-05-31

6.  Simulation of chaotic EEG patterns with a dynamic model of the olfactory system.

Authors:  W J Freeman
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.086

Review 7.  The functional states of the thalamus and the associated neuronal interplay.

Authors:  M Steriade; R R Llinás
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 37.312

8.  A model of the spatial-temporal characteristics of the alpha rhythm.

Authors:  A van Rotterdam; F H Lopes da Silva; J van den Ende; M A Viergever; A J Hermans
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.758

9.  Intensity-amplitude relationships in monkey event-related potentials: parallels to human augmenting-reducing responses.

Authors:  J A Pineda; T C Holmes; S L Foote
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-06

10.  Visual receptive fields and response properties of neurons in human temporal lobe and visual pathways.

Authors:  C L Wilson; T L Babb; E Halgren; P H Crandall
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  52 in total

1.  Modeling of entorhinal cortex and simulation of epileptic activity: insights into the role of inhibition-related parameters.

Authors:  Etienne Labyt; Paul Frogerais; Laura Uva; Jean-Jacques Bellanger; Fabrice Wendling
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  2007-07

2.  Influence of coherence between multiple cortical columns on alpha rhythm: a computational modeling study.

Authors:  Yasushi Naruse; Ayumu Matani; Yoichi Miyawaki; Masato Okada
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Modeling the effect of sleep regulation on a neural mass model.

Authors:  Michael Schellenberger Costa; Jan Born; Jens Christian Claussen; Thomas Martinetz
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 1.621

4.  Analytically determining frequency and amplitude of spontaneous alpha oscillation in Jansen's neural mass model using the describing function method.

Authors:  Yao Xu; Chun-Hui Zhang; Ernst Niebur; Jun-Song Wang
Journal:  Chin Phys B       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.494

5.  Evidence for frequency-dependent cortical plasticity in the human brain.

Authors:  Caroline A Lea-Carnall; Nelson J Trujillo-Barreto; Marcelo A Montemurro; Wael El-Deredy; Laura M Parkes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Electroencephalogram and visual evoked potential generation in a mathematical model of coupled cortical columns.

Authors:  B H Jansen; V G Rit
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  UKF-based closed loop iterative learning control of epileptiform wave in a neural mass model.

Authors:  Bonan Shan; Jiang Wang; Bin Deng; Xile Wei; Haitao Yu; Huiyan Li
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 5.082

8.  Realistic modeling of entorhinal cortex field potentials and interpretation of epileptic activity in the guinea pig isolated brain preparation.

Authors:  E Labyt; L Uva; M de Curtis; F Wendling
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  A physiologically plausible spatio-temporal model for EEG signals recorded with intracerebral electrodes in human partial epilepsy.

Authors:  Delphine Cosandier-Rimélé; Jean-Michel Badier; Patrick Chauvel; Fabrice Wendling
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.538

10.  Bayesian estimation of synaptic physiology from the spectral responses of neural masses.

Authors:  R J Moran; K E Stephan; S J Kiebel; N Rombach; W T O'Connor; K J Murphy; R B Reilly; K J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.