Literature DB >> 8507549

Evidence for multiple generators in evoked responses using finite difference field mapping: auditory evoked fields.

J E Moran1, N Tepley, G P Jacobson, G L Barkley.   

Abstract

Electric potential maps and magnetic field maps have been used to study brain electrical activity. During the temporal course of an evoked cortical response, the electrical activity of specific neuronal subpopulations change in a sequential manner giving rise to measurable electrical potentials and magnetic fields. For these potentials and fields, both the amplitude and rate of amplitude change have characteristic, time-dependent waveforms. Presently, amplitude waveforms from multiple locations are used to generate magnetic field and electric potential maps which have been found to be useful in understanding the activity of the neurons which give rise to these maps (Romani 1990). This paper introduces a data transformation technique which results in a derived map that we have termed a "finite difference field map" (FDFM). This mapping technique provides information associated with the rate at which the amplitude of the neuronal electric activity changes. In this paper, some advantage of FDFM analysis are illustrated by application of this technique to the study of the auditory evoked cortical field (AECF) N1m waveform. Using data obtained from normal subjects it will be demonstrated that application of the FDFM technique allows the localization of the primary N1m source at an earlier latency than is possible using the conventional waveform data. The source location determined at an early latency by FDFM analysis was identical to that obtained at later from the conventional field data. These data suggest that the primary N1m source is stationary. In addition, analysis of the time sequence of FDFM field maps contains evidence of a second spatially separate source which is co-active with primary N1m source.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8507549     DOI: 10.1007/BF01128990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Topogr        ISSN: 0896-0267            Impact factor:   3.020


  15 in total

Review 1.  Localization of brain activity with magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  G L Romani; V Pizzella
Journal:  Adv Neurol       Date:  1990

2.  Neuromagnetic evidence of a dynamic excitation pattern generating the N100 auditory response.

Authors:  R L Rogers; A C Papanicolaou; S B Baumann; C Saydjari; H M Eisenberg
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1990 May-Jun

3.  The brain's magnetic field: some effects of multiple sources on localization methods.

Authors:  P L Nunez
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-01

4.  Two bilateral sources of the late AEP as identified by a spatio-temporal dipole model.

Authors:  M Scherg; D Von Cramon
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-01

5.  Evoked dipole source potentials of the human auditory cortex.

Authors:  M Scherg; D Von Cramon
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-09

6.  Mixed and sensory nerve stimulations activate different cytoarchitectonic areas in the human primary somatosensory cortex SI. Neuromagnetic recordings and statistical considerations.

Authors:  E Kaukoranta; M Hämäläinen; J Sarvas; R Hari
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory.

Authors:  R C Oldfield
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Scalp distribution of human auditory evoked potentials. II. Evidence for overlapping sources and involvement of auditory cortex.

Authors:  C C Wood; J R Wolpaw
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1982-07

9.  A temporal component of the auditory evoked response.

Authors:  J R Wolpaw; J K Penry
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1975-12

10.  Auditory evoked cortical magnetic field (M100-M200) measurements in tinnitus and normal groups.

Authors:  G P Jacobson; B K Ahmad; J Moran; C W Newman; N Tepley; J Wharton
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  2 in total

1.  Tonotopic cortical representation of periodic complex sounds.

Authors:  Selene Cansino; Antoine Ducorps; Richard Ragot
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Hemispheric asymmetry in mid and long latency neuromagnetic responses to single clicks.

Authors:  Mary F Howard; David Poeppel
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 3.208

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.