Literature DB >> 2091714

Intersession replicability of dipole parameters from three components of the auditory evoked magnetic field.

S B Baumann1, R L Rogers, A C Papanicolaou, C L Saydjari.   

Abstract

The replicability of dipole localizations between sessions in an unselected group of subjects was studied. Auditory evoked magnetic fields (AEMFs) in response to contralaterally and ipsilaterally presented 1 kHz tone bursts were recorded from the right hemisphere of 12 subjects with normal hearing in two replicate sessions several days apart. Three long-latency components of the AEMF were studied, occurring at latencies near 50 msec (P1m), near 100 msec (N1m) and near 165 msec (P2m). A spherical model of the head was used to fit equivalent-current dipoles to the data. Statistical analysis of dipole parameters revealed virtually no differences between the two testing sessions. The variability between sessions had a mean absolute difference of 3 to 10 mm for the spatial parameters. Comparison of dipole parameters between components showed that there was a replicable, but nonsignificant, trend for a difference in the location of the N1m from contralateral vs. ipsilateral stimulation, and a statistically significant confirmation that the P2m is located anterior to the N1m for contralateral stimulation. Magnetic resonance images from each subject were used to locate the dipoles near the primary auditory cortex in the Sylvian fissure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2091714     DOI: 10.1007/BF01135440

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Topogr        ISSN: 0896-0267            Impact factor:   3.020


  14 in total

1.  Neuromagnetic evidence of a dynamic excitation pattern generating the N100 auditory response.

Authors:  R L Rogers; A C Papanicolaou; S B Baumann; C Saydjari; H M Eisenberg
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1990 May-Jun

2.  Localization of auditory response sources using magnetoencephalography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  A C Papanicolaou; S Baumann; R L Rogers; C Saydjari; E G Amparo; H M Eisenberg
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1990-01

3.  Magnetic fields of a dipole in special volume conductor shapes.

Authors:  B N Cuffin; D Cohen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Source localization of two evoked magnetic field components using two alternative procedures.

Authors:  A C Papanicolaou; R L Rogers; S Baumann; C Saydjari; H M Eisenberg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex revealed by transient auditory evoked magnetic fields.

Authors:  C Pantev; M Hoke; K Lehnertz; B Lütkenhöner; G Anogianakis; W Wittkowski
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1988-02

6.  The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure.

Authors:  R Näätänen; T Picton
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Tonotopic organization in human auditory cortex revealed by positron emission tomography.

Authors:  J L Lauter; P Herscovitch; C Formby; M E Raichle
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Magnetic auditory evoked fields: interhemispheric asymmetry.

Authors:  M Reite; J T Zimmerman; J E Zimmerman
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-04

9.  Auditory magnetic fields from the human cerebral cortex: location and strength of an equivalent current dipole.

Authors:  C Elberling; C Bak; B Kofoed; J Lebech; K Saermark
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 3.209

10.  Neuromagnetic responses of the human auditory cortex to on- and offsets of noise bursts.

Authors:  R Hari; M Pelizzone; J P Mäkelä; J Hällström; L Leinonen; O V Lounasmaa
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1987
View more
  3 in total

1.  Quantification and reproducibility of tracking cortical extent of activation by use of functional MR imaging and magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  T P Roberts; E A Disbrow; H C Roberts; H A Rowley
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Advantages and limitations of magnetic source imaging.

Authors:  S J Williamson; Z L Lü; D Karron; L Kaufman
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Modulation of Auditory Responses to Speech vs. Nonspeech Stimuli during Speech Movement Planning.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri; Ludo Max
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.169

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.