Literature DB >> 1573419

Motor evoked potentials to magnetic stimulation: technical considerations and normative data from 50 subjects.

A Furby1, J L Bourriez, J M Jacquesson, F Mounier-Vehier, J D Guieu.   

Abstract

Magnetic stimulation of the brain and cervical and lumbar spinal roots was performed on 50 healthy volunteers. Compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) were recorded from biceps brachii, abductor digiti minimi (ADM), rectus femoris and tibialis anterior (TA). We assessed central conduction times by subtraction of peripheral from central latencies and compared results using either spinal root stimulation or the F-wave method. Side-to-side differences of total conduction time, peripheral conduction time and central conduction time (CCT) were measured and the effect of clockwise vs counterclockwise stimulations on latencies and sizes of CMAPs is emphasized. Amplitudes and areas of CMAPs were expressed as a percentage of the peripheral M response for ADM and TA. There was a positive correlation between CCT to the lumbosacral region and height, but not between the cervical region and height. No correlation was observed between genders and central conduction times, amplitudes or areas of CMAPs.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1573419     DOI: 10.1007/bf00833916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   4.849


  23 in total

1.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: specific and non-specific facilitation of magnetic motor evoked potentials.

Authors:  A Hufnagel; M Jaeger; C E Elger
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Clinical use of the magnetic stimulator in the investigation of peripheral conduction time.

Authors:  T C Britton; B U Meyer; J Herdmann; R Benecke
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.217

3.  Motor evoked potentials with magnetic stimulation: correlations with height.

Authors:  N S Chu
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec

4.  Central motor conduction studies in motor neurone disease using magnetic brain stimulation.

Authors:  T N Schriefer; C W Hess; K R Mills; N M Murray
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec

5.  Magnetic brain stimulation: central motor conduction studies in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  C W Hess; K R Mills; N M Murray; T N Schriefer
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 10.422

6.  F-wave velocity in the central segment of the median and ulnar nerves. A study in normal subjects and in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.

Authors:  J Kimura
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Measurement of central motor conduction in multiple sclerosis by magnetic brain stimulation.

Authors:  C W Hess; K R Mills; N M Murray
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-08-16       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  [Study of central motor pathways using cortical magnetic stimulation and spinal electrical stimulation: results in 20 normal subjects].

Authors:  F Tabaraud; J Hugon; J Y Salle; J M Boulesteix; J M Vallat; M Dumas
Journal:  Rev Neurol (Paris)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.607

9.  Magnetic stimulation of the human brain and peripheral nervous system: an introduction and the results of an initial clinical evaluation.

Authors:  A T Barker; I L Freeston; R Jalinous; J A Jarratt
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Mechanisms of nervous propagation along central motor pathways: noninvasive evaluation in healthy subjects and in patients with neurological disease.

Authors:  P M Rossini; M D Caramia; F Zarola
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.654

View more
  6 in total

1.  The influence of gender, hand dominance, and upper extremity length on motor evoked potentials.

Authors:  Scott C Livingston; Howard P Goodkin; Christopher D Ingersoll
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Superconditioning TMS for examining upper motor neuron function in MND.

Authors:  Blair Calancie; Eufrosina Young; Mary Lou Watson; Dongliang Wang; Natalia Alexeeva
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  A practical guide to diagnostic transcranial magnetic stimulation: report of an IFCN committee.

Authors:  S Groppa; A Oliviero; A Eisen; A Quartarone; L G Cohen; V Mall; A Kaelin-Lang; T Mima; S Rossi; G W Thickbroom; P M Rossini; U Ziemann; J Valls-Solé; H R Siebner
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-02-19       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Intermittent theta-burst stimulation induces correlated changes in cortical and corticospinal excitability in healthy older subjects.

Authors:  Tamara Gedankien; Peter J Fried; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Mouhsin M Shafi
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  A multiple regression model of normal central and peripheral motor conduction times.

Authors:  Stephan R Jaiser; Jonathan D Barnes; Stuart N Baker; Mark R Baker
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 3.217

6.  Age, Height, and Sex on Motor Evoked Potentials: Translational Data From a Large Italian Cohort in a Clinical Environment.

Authors:  Mariagiovanna Cantone; Giuseppe Lanza; Luisa Vinciguerra; Valentina Puglisi; Riccardo Ricceri; Francesco Fisicaro; Carla Vagli; Rita Bella; Raffaele Ferri; Giovanni Pennisi; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Manuela Pennisi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.