Literature DB >> 11831814

Recognition of low-pass-filtered consonants in noise with normal and impaired high-frequency hearing.

Amy R Horwitz1, Judy R Dubno, Jayne B Ahlstrom.   

Abstract

People with high-frequency hearing loss often complain of difficulty understanding speech, particularly in noisy environments. The reduction in audible high-frequency speech information provides one explanation. In addition, high-frequency hearing loss may reduce the contribution from the "tails" of high-frequency auditory nerve fibers, resulting in diminished availability of lower frequency speech cues. This study was designed to determine if high-frequency hearing loss results in speech-understanding deficits beyond those accounted for by reduced high-frequency speech information. Recognition of speech, both low-pass filtered and unfiltered, was measured for subjects with normal hearing and those with hearing loss limited to high frequencies. Nonsense syllables were presented in three levels of noise that was spectrally shaped to match the long-term spectrum of the speech. Scores for subjects with impaired high-frequency hearing were significantly poorer than scores for subjects with normal hearing. In the case of the low-pass-filtered speech, performance differences between groups could not be attributed to differences in speech audibility, as high-frequency speech cues were absent for all subjects. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that high-frequency fibers encode useful low-frequency speech information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11831814     DOI: 10.1121/1.1427357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  19 in total

1.  Correction of the peripheral spatiotemporal response pattern: a potential new signal-processing strategy.

Authors:  Lu-Feng Shi; Laurel H Carney; Karen A Doherty
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Factors affecting the benefits of high-frequency amplification.

Authors:  Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Abnormal intelligibility of speech in competing speech and in noise in a frequency region where audiometric thresholds are near-normal for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Agnès C Léger; David T Ives; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Ototoxicity in children with high-risk neuroblastoma: prevalence, risk factors, and concordance of grading scales--a report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Wendy Landier; Kristin Knight; F Lennie Wong; Jin Lee; Ola Thomas; Heeyoung Kim; Susan G Kreissman; Mary Lou Schmidt; Lu Chen; Wendy B London; James G Gurney; Smita Bhatia
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Auditory filter shapes and high-frequency hearing in adults who have impaired speech in noise performance despite clinically normal audiograms.

Authors:  Rohima Badri; Jonathan H Siegel; Beverly A Wright
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Platinum-induced ototoxicity in children: a consensus review on mechanisms, predisposition, and protection, including a new International Society of Pediatric Oncology Boston ototoxicity scale.

Authors:  Penelope R Brock; Kristin R Knight; David R Freyer; Kathleen C M Campbell; Peter S Steyger; Brian W Blakley; Shahrad R Rassekh; Kay W Chang; Brian J Fligor; Kaukab Rajput; Michael Sullivan; Edward A Neuwelt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Central presbycusis: a review and evaluation of the evidence.

Authors:  Larry E Humes; Judy R Dubno; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Jennifer J Lister; Anthony T Cacace; Karen J Cruickshanks; George A Gates; Richard H Wilson; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  A comparative study of the audiological outcomes with Retro-X (semi-implantable hearing aid system) and conventional open fitting hearing aids.

Authors:  Minoo Lenarz; Thomas Lenarz; Martin Stieve; Mark Winter
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Effects of frequency compression and frequency transposition on fricative and affricate perception in listeners with normal hearing and mild to moderate hearing loss.

Authors:  Joshua M Alexander; Judy G Kopun; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Human Frequency Following Response: Neural Representation of Envelope and Temporal Fine Structure in Listeners with Normal Hearing and Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Saradha Ananthakrishnan; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Edward Bartlett
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.