Literature DB >> 24510352

The influence of vertically and horizontally aligned visual distractors on aurally guided saccadic eye movements.

A F Ten Brink1, T C W Nijboer, N Van der Stoep, S Van der Stigchel.   

Abstract

Eye movements towards a new target can be guided or disrupted by input from multiple modalities. The degree of oculomotor competition evoked by a distractor depends on both distractor and target properties, such as distractor salience or certainty regarding the target location. The ability to localize the target is particularly important when studying saccades made towards auditory targets, since determination of elevation and azimuth of a sound are based on different processes, and these processes may be affected independently by a distractor. We investigated the effects of a visual distractor on saccadic eye movements made to an auditory target in a two-dimensional plane. Results showed that the competition evoked by a vertical visual distractor was stronger compared with a horizontal visual distractor. The eye movements that were not captured by the vertical visual distractor were still influenced by it: a deviation of endpoints was seen in the direction of the visual distractor. Furthermore, the interference evoked by a high-contrast visual distractor was stronger compared with low-contrast visual stimuli, which was reflected by a faster initiation of an eye movement towards the high-contrast visual distractor and a stronger shift of endpoints in the direction of the high-contrast visual distractor. Together, these findings show that the influence of a visual distractor on aurally guided eye movements depends strongly on its location relative to the target, and to a lesser extent, on stimulus contrast.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24510352     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-3854-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  34 in total

1.  Influence of attentional capture on oculomotor control.

Authors:  J Theeuwes; A F Kramer; S Hahn; D E Irwin; G J Zelinsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Multimodal visual-somatosensory integration in saccade generation.

Authors:  Richard Amlôt; Robin Walker; Jon Driver; Charles Spence
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Sensory uncertainty governs the extent of audio-visual interaction.

Authors:  J Heron; D Whitaker; P V McGraw
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  Integration of competing saccade programs.

Authors:  Amelia R Hunt; Bettina Olk; Adrian von Mühlenen; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2004-04

5.  Recent advances in the study of saccade trajectory deviations.

Authors:  Stefan Van der Stigchel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Effect of remote distractors on saccade programming: evidence for an extended fixation zone.

Authors:  R Walker; H Deubel; W X Schneider; J M Findlay
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  The deep layers of the superior colliculus.

Authors:  D L Sparks; R Hartwich-Young
Journal:  Rev Oculomot Res       Date:  1989

8.  Evidence for interactions between target selection and visual fixation for saccade generation in humans.

Authors:  D P Munoz; B D Corneil
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Global visual processing for saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  J M Findlay
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  The influence of auditory and visual distractors on human orienting gaze shifts.

Authors:  B D Corneil; D P Munoz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  3 in total

1.  Prior knowledge of spatiotemporal configuration facilitates crossmodal saccadic response : A TWIN analysis.

Authors:  Adele Diederich; Hans Colonius; Farid I Kandil
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Lack of multisensory integration in hemianopia: no influence of visual stimuli on aurally guided saccades to the blind hemifield.

Authors:  Antonia F Ten Brink; Tanja C W Nijboer; Douwe P Bergsma; Jason J S Barton; Stefan Van der Stigchel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Oculomotor interference of bimodal distractors.

Authors:  Jessica Heeman; Tanja C W Nijboer; Nathan Van der Stoep; Jan Theeuwes; Stefan Van der Stigchel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 1.886

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.