Literature DB >> 29691762

Object width modulates object-based attentional selection.

Joseph C Nah1, Marco Neppi-Modona2, Lars Strother3, Marlene Behrmann4, Sarah Shomstein5.   

Abstract

Visual input typically includes a myriad of objects, some of which are selected for further processing. While these objects vary in shape and size, most evidence supporting object-based guidance of attention is drawn from paradigms employing two identical objects. Importantly, object size is a readily perceived stimulus dimension, and whether it modulates the distribution of attention remains an open question. Across four experiments, the size of the objects in the display was manipulated in a modified version of the two-rectangle paradigm. In Experiment 1, two identical parallel rectangles of two sizes (thin or thick) were presented. Experiments 2-4 employed identical trapezoids (each having a thin and thick end), inverted in orientation. In the experiments, one end of an object was cued and participants performed either a T/L discrimination or a simple target-detection task. Combined results show that, in addition to the standard object-based attentional advantage, there was a further attentional benefit for processing information contained in the thick versus thin end of objects. Additionally, eye-tracking measures demonstrated increased saccade precision towards thick object ends, suggesting that Fitts's Law may play a role in object-based attentional shifts. Taken together, these results suggest that object-based attentional selection is modulated by object width.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention: Selective; Eye movements and visual attention; Object-based attention

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29691762      PMCID: PMC6095707          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-018-1530-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  72 in total

1.  Covert visual spatial orienting and saccades: overlapping neural systems.

Authors:  A C Nobre; D R Gitelman; E C Dias; M M Mesulam
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Functional organization of human intraparietal and frontal cortex for attending, looking, and pointing.

Authors:  Serguei V Astafiev; Gordon L Shulman; Christine M Stanley; Abraham Z Snyder; David C Van Essen; Maurizio Corbetta
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Visual parsing and response competition: the effect of grouping factors.

Authors:  G C Baylis; J Driver
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-02

4.  The role of closure in defining the "objects" of object-based attention.

Authors:  Alexandria C Marino; Brian J Scholl
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-10

5.  Object-based attention: strength of object representation and attentional guidance.

Authors:  Sarah Shomstein; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-01

6.  Selective attention and the organization of visual information.

Authors:  J Duncan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1984-12

7.  Object-based attention: sensory enhancement or scanning prioritization.

Authors:  Ming-Chou Ho
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2011-05-31

8.  Imagery, memory, and size-distance invariance.

Authors:  T L Hubbard; D Kall; J C Baird
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1989-01

9.  Attention and the detection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; C R Snyder; B J Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-06

10.  fMRI correlates of object-based attentional facilitation vs. suppression of irrelevant stimuli, dependent on global grouping and endogenous cueing.

Authors:  Elliot D Freeman; Emiliano Macaluso; Geraint Rees; Jon Driver
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-10
View more
  1 in total

1.  Effects of cue validity on attentional selection.

Authors:  Hao Lou; Monicque M Lorist; Karin S Pilz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.004

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.