Literature DB >> 17048741

Target-nontarget similarity modulates stimulus-driven control in visual search.

Michael J Proulx1, Howard E Egeth.   

Abstract

The literature contains conflicting results concerning whether an irrelevant featural singleton (an item unique with respect to a feature such as color or brightness) can control attention in a stimulus-driven manner. The present study explores whether target-nontarget similarity influences stimulus-driven shifts of attention to a distractor. An experiment evaluated whether manipulating target-nontarget similarity by varying orientation would modulate distraction by an irrelevant feature (a bright singleton). We found that increasing target-nontarget similarity resulted in a decreased impact of a uniquely bright object on visual search. This method of manipulating the target-nontarget similarity independent of the salience of a distracting feature suggests that the extent to which visual attention is stimulus-driven depends on the target-nontarget similarity.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17048741     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193880

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  20 in total

1.  Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture.

Authors:  Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-02

2.  Bottom-up and top-down control in visual search.

Authors:  Wieske van Zoest; Mieke Donk
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  It's under control: top-down search strategies can override attentional capture.

Authors:  Andrew B Leber; Howard E Egeth
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-02

4.  Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity.

Authors:  J Theeuwes
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-08

5.  Cross-dimensional interaction and texture segregation.

Authors:  H Pashler
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-04

6.  Visual search and stimulus similarity.

Authors:  J Duncan; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Allocation of attention in the visual field.

Authors:  C W Eriksen; Y Y Yeh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture.

Authors:  W F Bacon; H E Egeth
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-05

9.  Attentional misguidance in visual search.

Authors:  S Todd; A F Kramer
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-08

10.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search.

Authors:  S Yantis; J Jonides
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  10 in total

1.  Biased competition and visual search: the role of luminance and size contrast.

Authors:  Michael J Proulx; Howard E Egeth
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-08-08

Review 2.  Anticlockwise or clockwise? A dynamic Perception-Action-Laterality model for directionality bias in visuospatial functioning.

Authors:  A K M Rezaul Karim; Michael J Proulx; Lora T Likova
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 3.  Attention-like processes in insects.

Authors:  Vivek Nityananda
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Context-dependent control over attentional capture.

Authors:  Joshua D Cosman; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  The problem of latent attentional capture: Easy visual search conceals capture by task-irrelevant abrupt onsets.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Eric Ruthruff; Mei-Ching Lien
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Individual differences and metacognitive knowledge of visual search strategy.

Authors:  Michael J Proulx
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A Neuro-Computational Model for Discrete-Continuous Dual-Task Process.

Authors:  Maryam Sadeghi Talarposhti; Mohammad Ali Ahmadi-Pajouh; Farzad Towhidkhah
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 2.380

8.  Does numerical similarity alter age-related distractibility in working memory?

Authors:  Chiara Francesca Tagliabue; Debora Brignani; Veronica Mazza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Differential roles of the dorsal prefrontal and posterior parietal cortices in visual search: a TMS study.

Authors:  Yulong Yan; Rizhen Wei; Qian Zhang; Zhenlan Jin; Ling Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Evaluating the Role of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex and Posterior Parietal Cortex in Memory-Guided Attention With Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Min Wang; Ping Yang; Chaoyang Wan; Zhenlan Jin; Junjun Zhang; Ling Li
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.