Literature DB >> 12603766

Simulation in surgical training: educational issues and practical implications.

Roger Kneebone1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical skills are required by a wide range of health care professionals. Tasks range from simple wound closure to highly complex diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Technical expertise, although essential, is only one component of a complex picture. By emphasising the importance of knowledge and attitudes, this article aims to locate the acquisition of surgical skills within a wider educational framework. SIMULATORS: Simulators can provide safe, realistic learning environments for repeated practice, underpinned by feedback and objective metrics of performance. Using a simple classification of simulators into model-based, computer-based or hybrid, this paper summarises the current state of the art and describes recent technological developments. Advances in computing have led to the establishment of precision placement and simple manipulation simulators within health care education, while complex manipulation and integrated procedure simulators are still in the development phase. EVALUATION: Tension often exists between the design and evaluation of surgical simulations. A lack of high quality published data is compounded by the difficulties of conducting longitudinal studies in such a fast-moving field. The implications of this tension are discussed. THE WIDER CONTEXT: The emphasis is now shifting from the technology of simulation towards partnership with education and clinical practice. This highlights the need for an integrated learning framework, where knowledge can be acquired alongside technical skills and not in isolation from them. Recent work on situated learning underlines the potential for simulation to feed into and enrich everyday clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12603766     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01440.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  80 in total

1.  Background-incorporated volumetric model for patient-specific surgical simulation: a segmentation-free, modeling-free framework.

Authors:  Kei Wai Cecilia Hung; Megumi Nakao; Koji Yoshimura; Kotaro Minato
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Does previous laparoscopic experience improve ability to perform single-incision laparoscopic surgery?

Authors:  Trystan Lewis; Rajesh Aggarwal; Richard Kwasnicki; Ara Darzi; Paraskevas Paraskeva
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Simulation in surgical education.

Authors:  Vanessa N Palter; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Medical simulation in respiratory and critical care medicine.

Authors:  Godfrey Lam; Najib T Ayas; Donald E Griesdale; Adam D Peets
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 2.584

Review 5.  The role of simulation in neurosurgery.

Authors:  Roberta Rehder; Muhammad Abd-El-Barr; Kristopher Hooten; Peter Weinstock; Joseph R Madsen; Alan R Cohen
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  Simulation-based flexible ureteroscopy training using a novel ureteroscopy part-task trainer.

Authors:  Udi Blankstein; Andrea G Lantz; R John D'A Honey; Kenneth T Pace; Michael Ordon; Jason Young Lee
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  The role of ultrasound simulators in education: an investigation into sonography student experiences and clinical mentor perceptions.

Authors:  Vivien Gibbs
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2015-09-15

8.  Tissue consistency perception in laparoscopy to define the level of fidelity in virtual reality simulation.

Authors:  P Lamata; E J Gómez; F M Sánchez-Margallo; F Lamata; F del Pozo; J Usón
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-20       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Surgeon-Authored Virtual Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy Module Is Judged Effective and Preferred Over Traditional Teaching Tools.

Authors:  Sergei Kurenov; Juan Cendan; Saleh Dindar; Kristopher Attwood; James Hassett; Ruth Nawotniak; Gregory Cherr; William G Cance; Jörg Peters
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 2.058

10.  How to build your own coronary anastomosis simulator from scratch.

Authors:  Jan M De Raet; Jaime Arroyo; Sumy Büchner; Sabrina Siregard; Martin Andreas; Fredrik Halvorsen; Antje Grabosch; Mandy Stubbendorff
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.