Literature DB >> 16849247

Hydrodynamic modelling of aquatic suction performance and intra-oral pressures: limitations for comparative studies.

Sam Van Wassenbergh1, Peter Aerts, Anthony Herrel.   

Abstract

The magnitude of sub-ambient pressure inside the bucco-pharyngeal cavity of aquatic animals is generally considered a valuable metric of suction feeding performance. However, these pressures do not provide a direct indication of the effect of the suction act on the movement of the prey item. Especially when comparing suction performance of animals with differences in the shape of the expanding bucco-pharyngeal cavity, the link between speed of expansion, water velocity, force exerted on the prey and intra-oral pressure remains obscure. By using mathematical models of the heads of catfishes, a morphologically diverse group of aquatic suction feeders, these relationships were tested. The kinematics of these models were fine-tuned to transport a given prey towards the mouth in the same way. Next, the calculated pressures inside these models were compared. The results show that no simple relationship exists between the amount of generated sub-ambient pressure and the force exerted on the prey during suction feeding, unless animals of the same species are compared. Therefore, for evaluating suction performance in aquatic animals in future studies, the focus should be on the flow velocities in front of the mouth, for which a direct relationship exists with the hydrodynamic force exerted on prey.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16849247      PMCID: PMC1664642          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2005.0110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  13 in total

1.  Sucking while swimming: evaluating the effects of ram speed on suction generation in bluegill sunfish Lepomis macrochirus using digital particle image velocimetry.

Authors:  Timothy E Higham; Steven W Day; Peter C Wainwright
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Scaling of suction feeding performance in the catfish Clarias gariepinus.

Authors:  Sam Van Wassenbergh; Peter Aerts; Anthony Herrel
Journal:  Physiol Biochem Zool       Date:  2005-11-11       Impact factor: 2.247

3.  Scaling of suction-feeding kinematics and dynamics in the African catfish, Clarias gariepinus.

Authors:  Sam Van Wassenbergh; Peter Aerts; Anthony Herrel
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Linking cranial kinematics, buccal pressure, and suction feeding performance in largemouth bass.

Authors:  Richard Svanbäck; Peter C Wainwright; Lara A Ferry-Graham
Journal:  Physiol Biochem Zool       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.247

5.  Morphology predicts suction feeding performance in centrarchid fishes.

Authors:  Andrew M Carroll; Peter C Wainwright; Stephen H Huskey; David C Collar; Ralph G Turingan
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Morphological basis of kinematic diversity in feeding sunfishes

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Modulation of buccal pressure during prey capture in Hexagrammos decagrammus (Teleostei: Hexagrammidae)

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Muscular basis of buccal pressure: inflation behavior in the striped burrfish Chilomycterus schoepfi

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Kinematics of feeding in bluegill sunfish: is there a general distinction between aquatic capture and transport behaviors?

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Use of sonomicrometry demonstrates the link between prey capture kinematics and suction pressure in largemouth bass.

Authors:  Christopher P J Sanford; Peter C Wainwright
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  16 in total

1.  Biomechanical trade-offs bias rates of evolution in the feeding apparatus of fishes.

Authors:  Roi Holzman; David C Collar; Samantha A Price; C Darrin Hulsey; Robert C Thomson; Peter C Wainwright
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Hydrodynamics of prey capture in sharks: effects of substrate.

Authors:  Sandra Nauwelaerts; Cheryl Wilga; Christopher Sanford; George Lauder
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2007-04-22       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  The forces exerted by aquatic suction feeders on their prey.

Authors:  Peter C Wainwright; Steven W Day
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  The smaller your mouth, the longer your snout: predicting the snout length of Syngnathus acus, Centriscus scutatus and other pipette feeders.

Authors:  Marc H E de Lussanet; M Muller
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Jaw protrusion enhances forces exerted on prey by suction feeding fishes.

Authors:  Roi Holzman; Steven W Day; Rita S Mehta; Peter C Wainwright
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 6.  Aquatic suction feeding dynamics: insights from computational modelling.

Authors:  Sam Van Wassenbergh; Peter Aerts
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Anterior-to-posterior wave of buccal expansion in suction feeding fishes is critical for optimizing fluid flow velocity profile.

Authors:  Kristin L Bishop; Peter C Wainwright; Roi Holzman
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Swimming muscles power suction feeding in largemouth bass.

Authors:  Ariel L Camp; Thomas J Roberts; Elizabeth L Brainerd
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Channel catfish use higher coordination to capture prey than to swallow.

Authors:  Aaron M Olsen; L Patricia Hernández; Ariel L Camp; Elizabeth L Brainerd
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Aquatic feeding in pipid frogs: the use of suction for prey capture.

Authors:  Carrie A Carreño; Kiisa C Nishikawa
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.