Literature DB >> 9318463

Kinematics of feeding in bluegill sunfish: is there a general distinction between aquatic capture and transport behaviors?

.   

Abstract

Despite numerous studies of food transport in terrestrial vertebrates, little is known about this aspect of the feeding repertoire in aquatic vertebrates. Previous work had predicted that the kinematics of aquatic prey capture by suction feeding should be similar to those of prey transport. However, recent analyses of aquatic prey capture and transport in the tiger salamander Ambystoma tigrinum have contradicted this hypothesis, and document numerous differences between these two behaviors. In this study, using high-speed video and statistical analyses, we compare prey capture and transport kinematics in a ray-finned fish (Lepomis macrochirus, the bluegill sunfish) to examine the generality of differences between capture and transport behaviors in aquatic vertebrates. Compared with prey capture, prey transport is significantly more rapid and tends to have reduced lower jaw excursions, while having similar hyoid movements. A nested analysis of variance was used to analyze six variables common to both this analysis of Lepomis macrochirus and a previous study of Ambystoma tigrinum; none of these six variables showed significant variation between taxa. These results indicate that aquatic prey transport is kinematically distinct from capture behavior and that the distinctions between these two behaviors are remarkably consistent in two phylogenetically divergent lower vertebrate taxa. Such consistent kinematic differences have not been found in amniote taxa studied to date, but may constitute a plesiomorphic feature of vertebrate feeding systems.

Entities:  

Year:  1995        PMID: 9318463     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.198.3.709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  5 in total

1.  Hydrodynamic modelling of aquatic suction performance and intra-oral pressures: limitations for comparative studies.

Authors:  Sam Van Wassenbergh; Peter Aerts; Anthony Herrel
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  A fish that uses its hydrodynamic tongue to feed on land.

Authors:  Krijn B Michel; Egon Heiss; Peter Aerts; Sam Van Wassenbergh
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Chemical defense: aquatic beetle (Dineutes hornii) vs. fish (Micropterus salmoides).

Authors:  T Eisner; D J Aneshansley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Channel catfish use higher coordination to capture prey than to swallow.

Authors:  Aaron M Olsen; L Patricia Hernández; Ariel L Camp; Elizabeth L Brainerd
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  An XROMM Study of Food Transport and Swallowing in Channel Catfish.

Authors:  H I Weller; A M Olsen; A L Camp; A R Manafzadeh; L P Hernandez; E L Brainerd
Journal:  Integr Org Biol       Date:  2020-06-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.