Literature DB >> 16000535

Sucking while swimming: evaluating the effects of ram speed on suction generation in bluegill sunfish Lepomis macrochirus using digital particle image velocimetry.

Timothy E Higham1, Steven W Day, Peter C Wainwright.   

Abstract

It is well established that suction feeding fish use a variable amount of swimming (ram) during prey capture. However, the fluid mechanical effects of ram on suction feeding are not well established. In this study we quantified the effects of ram on the maximum fluid speed of the water entering the mouth during feeding as well as the spatial patterns of flow entering the mouth of suction-feeding bluegill sunfish Lepomis macrochirus. Using Digital Particle Image Velocimetry (DPIV) and high-speed video, we observed the flow in front of the mouth of three fish using a vertical laser sheet positioned on the mid-sagittal plane of the fish. From this we quantified the maximum fluid speed (measured at a distance in front of the mouth equal to one half of the maximum mouth diameter), the degree of focusing of water flow entering the mouth, and the shape of the ingested volume of water. Ram speed in 41 feeding sequences, measured at the time of maximum gape, ranged between 0 and 25 cm s(-1), and the ratio of ram speed to fluid speed ranged from 0.1% to 19.1%. In a regression ram speed did not significantly affect peak fluid speed, but with an increase in ram speed the degree of focusing of water entering the mouth increased significantly, and the shape of the ingested volume of water became more elongate and narrow. The implications of these findings are that (1) suction feeders that employ ram of between 0% and 20% of fluid speed sacrifice little in terms of the fluid speeds they generate and (2) ram speed enhances the total body closing speed of the predator.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16000535     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.01682

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  9 in total

1.  Hydrodynamic modelling of aquatic suction performance and intra-oral pressures: limitations for comparative studies.

Authors:  Sam Van Wassenbergh; Peter Aerts; Anthony Herrel
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  A faster escape does not enhance survival in zebrafish larvae.

Authors:  Arjun Nair; Christy Nguyen; Matthew J McHenry
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Aquatic suction feeding dynamics: insights from computational modelling.

Authors:  Sam Van Wassenbergh; Peter Aerts
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Modelled three-dimensional suction accuracy predicts prey capture success in three species of centrarchid fishes.

Authors:  Emily A Kane; Timothy E Higham
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Aquatic feeding in pipid frogs: the use of suction for prey capture.

Authors:  Carrie A Carreño; Kiisa C Nishikawa
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Relative importance of growth and behaviour to elasmobranch suction-feeding performance over early ontogeny.

Authors:  Dayv Lowry; Philip J Motta
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Physiological Trade-Offs Along a Fast-Slow Lifestyle Continuum in Fishes: What Do They Tell Us about Resistance and Resilience to Hypoxia?

Authors:  Rick J Stoffels
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Multisensory integration and behavioral plasticity in sharks from different ecological niches.

Authors:  Jayne M Gardiner; Jelle Atema; Robert E Hueter; Philip J Motta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Absence of suction feeding ichthyosaurs and its implications for triassic mesopelagic paleoecology.

Authors:  Ryosuke Motani; Cheng Ji; Taketeru Tomita; Neil Kelley; Erin Maxwell; Da-yong Jiang; Paul Martin Sander
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.