Literature DB >> 17251144

Hydrodynamics of prey capture in sharks: effects of substrate.

Sandra Nauwelaerts1, Cheryl Wilga, Christopher Sanford, George Lauder.   

Abstract

In suction feeding, a volume of water is drawn into the mouth of a predator. Previous studies of suction feeding in fishes have shown that significant fluid velocities are confined to a region within one mouth width from the mouth. Therefore, the predator must be relatively close to the prey to ensure capture success. Here, theoretical modelling is combined with empirical data to unravel the mechanism behind feeding on a substrate. First, we approached the problem theoretically by combining the stream functions of two sinks. Computational fluid dynamics modelling is then applied to make quantitative predictions regarding the effects of substrate proximity on the feeding hydrodynamics of a benthic shark. An oblique circular cylinder and a shark head model were used. To test the models, we used digital particle image velocimetry to record fluid flow around the mouth of white-spotted bamboo sharks, Chiloscyllium plagiosum, during suction feeding on the substrate and in the water column. Empirical results confirmed the modelling predictions: the length of the flow field can be doubled due to passive substrate effects during prey capture. Feeding near a substrate extends the distance over which suction is effective and a predator strike can be effective further from the prey.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17251144      PMCID: PMC2359864          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2006.0180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  4 in total

1.  Spatial and temporal patterns of water flow generated by suction-feeding bluegill sunfish Lepomis macrochirus resolved by Particle Image Velocimetry.

Authors:  Steven W Day; Timothy E Higham; Angela Y Cheer; Peter C Wainwright
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Hydrodynamic modelling of aquatic suction performance and intra-oral pressures: limitations for comparative studies.

Authors:  Sam Van Wassenbergh; Peter Aerts; Anthony Herrel
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Quantification of flow during suction feeding in bluegill sunfish.

Authors:  Lara A Ferry-Graham; Peter C Wainwright; George V Lauder
Journal:  Zoology (Jena)       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Use of sonomicrometry demonstrates the link between prey capture kinematics and suction pressure in largemouth bass.

Authors:  Christopher P J Sanford; Peter C Wainwright
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.312

  4 in total
  10 in total

1.  The forces exerted by aquatic suction feeders on their prey.

Authors:  Peter C Wainwright; Steven W Day
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Jaw protrusion enhances forces exerted on prey by suction feeding fishes.

Authors:  Roi Holzman; Steven W Day; Rita S Mehta; Peter C Wainwright
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 3.  Aquatic suction feeding dynamics: insights from computational modelling.

Authors:  Sam Van Wassenbergh; Peter Aerts
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Cranial morphology of the orectolobiform shark, Chiloscyllium punctatum Müller & Henle, 1838.

Authors:  Manuel Andreas Staggl; Daniel Abed-Navandi; Jürgen Kriwet
Journal:  Vertebr Zool       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 1.879

5.  Relative importance of growth and behaviour to elasmobranch suction-feeding performance over early ontogeny.

Authors:  Dayv Lowry; Philip J Motta
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  The coelacanth rostral organ is a unique low-resolution electro-detector that facilitates the feeding strike.

Authors:  Rachel M Berquist; Vitaly L Galinsky; Stephen M Kajiura; Lawrence R Frank
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Feeding Behavior of Subadult Sixgill Sharks (Hexanchus griseus) at a Bait Station.

Authors:  Bryan McNeil; Dayv Lowry; Shawn Larson; Denise Griffing
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Fishes can use axial muscles as anchors or motors for powerful suction feeding.

Authors:  Ariel L Camp; Aaron M Olsen; L Patricia Hernandez; Elizabeth L Brainerd
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Electroreceptive and mechanoreceptive anatomical specialisations in the epaulette shark (Hemiscyllium ocellatum).

Authors:  Marit Winther-Janson; Barbara E Wueringer; Jamie E Seymour
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Multisensory integration and behavioral plasticity in sharks from different ecological niches.

Authors:  Jayne M Gardiner; Jelle Atema; Robert E Hueter; Philip J Motta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.