Literature DB >> 15472018

Morphology predicts suction feeding performance in centrarchid fishes.

Andrew M Carroll1, Peter C Wainwright, Stephen H Huskey, David C Collar, Ralph G Turingan.   

Abstract

Suction feeding fish differ in their capacity to generate subambient pressure while feeding, and these differences appear to relate to morphological variation. We developed a morphological model of force transmission in the fish head and parameterized it with measurements from individual fish. The model was applied to 45 individuals from five species of centrarchid fishes: Lepomis macrochirus, Lepomis punctatus, Lepomis microlophus, Micropterus salmoides and Pomoxis nigromaculatus. Measurements of epaxial cross-sectional area, epaxial moment arm, buccal area and buccal area moment arm were combined to estimate pressure generation capacity for individual fish. This estimation was correlated with pressure measured in fish feeding on elusive prey to test the model's ability to predict pressure generation from morphology. The model explained differences in pressure generation found among individuals (P<0.001, r2=0.71) and produced a realistic estimate of normalized muscle stress during suction feeding (68.5+/-6.7 kPa). Fish with smaller mouths, larger epaxial cross-sectional area and longer epaxial moments, such as L. macrochirus (bluegill sunfish), generated lower pressures than fish with larger mouths, smaller cross-sectional area and shorter moments, such as M. salmoides (largemouth bass). These results reveal a direct trade-off between morphological requirements of feeding on larger prey (larger mouth size relative to body depth) and the ability to generate subambient pressure while suction feeding on elusive prey.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15472018     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.01227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  38 in total

1.  Biomechanical trade-offs bias rates of evolution in the feeding apparatus of fishes.

Authors:  Roi Holzman; David C Collar; Samantha A Price; C Darrin Hulsey; Robert C Thomson; Peter C Wainwright
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Hydrodynamic modelling of aquatic suction performance and intra-oral pressures: limitations for comparative studies.

Authors:  Sam Van Wassenbergh; Peter Aerts; Anthony Herrel
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  The forces exerted by aquatic suction feeders on their prey.

Authors:  Peter C Wainwright; Steven W Day
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Jaw protrusion enhances forces exerted on prey by suction feeding fishes.

Authors:  Roi Holzman; Steven W Day; Rita S Mehta; Peter C Wainwright
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  How fish power suction feeding.

Authors:  Mark W Westneat; Aaron M Olsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  A promising future for integrative biodiversity research: an increased role of scale-dependency and functional biology.

Authors:  S A Price; L Schmitz
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  Speciation through the lens of biomechanics: locomotion, prey capture and reproductive isolation.

Authors:  Timothy E Higham; Sean M Rogers; R Brian Langerhans; Heather A Jamniczky; George V Lauder; William J Stewart; Christopher H Martin; David N Reznick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Four-bar linkage modelling in teleost pharyngeal jaws: computer simulations of bite kinetics.

Authors:  Justin R Grubich; Mark W Westneat
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.610

9.  Ancestral Plasticity and Allometry in Threespine Stickleback Fish Reveal Phenotypes Associated with Derived, Freshwater Ecotypes.

Authors:  Matthew A Wund; Sophie Valena; Susan Wood; John A Baker
Journal:  Biol J Linn Soc Lond       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 2.138

10.  Classification of threespine stickleback along the benthic-limnetic axis.

Authors:  James J Willacker; Frank A von Hippel; Peter R Wilton; Kelly M Walton
Journal:  Biol J Linn Soc Lond       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 2.138

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.