Literature DB >> 16849180

Nonlinear time-periodic models of the longitudinal flight dynamics of desert locusts Schistocerca gregaria.

Graham K Taylor1, Rafał Zbikowski.   

Abstract

Previous studies of insect flight control have been statistical in approach, simply correlating wing kinematics with body kinematics or force production. Kinematics and forces are linked by Newtonian mechanics, so adopting a dynamics-based approach is necessary if we are to place the study of insect flight on its proper physical footing. Here we develop semi-empirical models of the longitudinal flight dynamics of desert locusts Schistocerca gregaria. We use instantaneous force-moment measurements from individual locusts to parametrize the nonlinear rigid body equations of motion. Since the instantaneous forces are approximately periodic, we represent them using Fourier series, which are embedded in the equations of motion to give a nonlinear time-periodic (NLTP) model. This is a proper mathematical generalization of an earlier linear-time invariant (LTI) model of locust flight dynamics, developed using previously published time-averaged versions of the instantaneous force recordings. We perform various numerical simulations, within the fitted range of the model, and across the range of body angles used by free-flying locusts, to explore the likely behaviour of the locusts upon release from the tether. Solutions of the NLTP models are compared with solutions of the nonlinear time-invariant (NLTI) models to which they reduce when the periodic terms are dropped. Both sets of models are unstable and therefore fail to explain locust flight stability fully. Nevertheless, whereas the measured forces include statistically significant harmonic content up to about the eighth harmonic, the simulated flight trajectories display no harmonic content above the fundamental forcing frequency. Hence, manoeuvre control in locusts will not directly reflect subtle changes in the higher harmonics of the wing beat, but must operate on a coarser time-scale. A state-space analysis of the NLTP models reveals orbital trajectories that are impossible to capture in the LTI and NLTI models, and inspires the hypothesis that asymptotic orbital stability is the proper definition of stability in flapping flight. Manoeuvre control on the scale of more than one wing beat would then consist in exciting transients from one asymptotically stable orbit to another. We summarize these hypotheses by proposing a limit-cycle analogy for flapping flight control and suggest experiments for verification of the limit-cycle control analogy hypothesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16849180      PMCID: PMC1664709          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2005.0036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  14 in total

Review 1.  Mechanics and aerodynamics of insect flight control.

Authors:  G K Taylor
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2001-11

2.  Dynamic flight stability of a hovering bumblebee.

Authors:  Mao Sun; Yan Xiong
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  The advantages of an unsteady panel method in modelling the aerodynamic forces on rigid flapping wings

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Dragonfly flight. II. Velocities, accelerations and kinematics of flapping flight.

Authors:  JM Wakeling; CP Ellington
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Dynamic flight stability in the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria.

Authors:  Graham K Taylor; Adrian L R Thomas
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Sensory regulation of wing twisting in locusts.

Authors:  E Gettrup
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1966-02       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  The control of wing kinematics and flight forces in fruit flies (Drosophila spp.).

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Relationships between body mass, motor output and flight variables during free flight of juvenile and mature adult locusts, Schistocerca gregaria.

Authors:  H Fischer; W Kutsch
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Locust wind receptors. I. Transducer mechanics and sensory response.

Authors:  J M Camhi
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1969-04       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Locust wind receptors. II. Interneurones in the cervical connective.

Authors:  J M Camhi
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1969-04       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  13 in total

1.  Floquet stability analysis of the longitudinal dynamics of two hovering model insects.

Authors:  Jiang Hao Wu; Mao Sun
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Photogrammetric reconstruction of high-resolution surface topographies and deformable wing kinematics of tethered locusts and free-flying hoverflies.

Authors:  Simon M Walker; Adrian L R Thomas; Graham K Taylor
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Nonlinear flight dynamics and stability of hovering model insects.

Authors:  Bin Liang; Mao Sun
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Controlling roll perturbations in fruit flies.

Authors:  Tsevi Beatus; John M Guckenheimer; Itai Cohen
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 5.  Aerodynamics, sensing and control of insect-scale flapping-wing flight.

Authors:  Wei Shyy; Chang-Kwon Kang; Pakpong Chirarattananon; Sridhar Ravi; Hao Liu
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.704

6.  Tomographic particle image velocimetry of desert locust wakes: instantaneous volumes combine to reveal hidden vortex elements and rapid wake deformation.

Authors:  Richard J Bomphrey; Per Henningsson; Dirk Michaelis; David Hollis
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Deformable wing kinematics in the desert locust: how and why do camber, twist and topography vary through the stroke?

Authors:  Simon M Walker; Adrian L R Thomas; Graham K Taylor
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Limit-cycle-based control of the myogenic wingbeat rhythm in the fruit fly Drosophila.

Authors:  Jan Bartussek; A Kadir Mutlu; Martin Zapotocky; Steven N Fry
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Motor output and control input in flapping flight: a compact model of the deforming wing kinematics of manoeuvring hoverflies.

Authors:  Indira Nagesh; Simon M Walker; Graham K Taylor
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Vision-based flight control in the hawkmoth Hyles lineata.

Authors:  Shane P Windsor; Richard J Bomphrey; Graham K Taylor
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 4.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.