Literature DB >> 9427672

The control of wing kinematics and flight forces in fruit flies (Drosophila spp.).

.   

Abstract

By simultaneously measuring flight forces and stroke kinematics in several species of fruit flies in the genus Drosophila, we have investigated the relationship between wing motion and aerodynamic force production. We induced tethered flies to vary their production of total flight force by presenting them with a vertically oscillating visual background within a closed-loop flight arena. In response to the visual motion, flies modulated their flight force by changing the translational velocity of their wings, which they accomplished via changes in both stroke amplitude and stroke frequency. Changes in wing velocity could not, however, account for all the modulation in flight force, indicating that the mean force coefficient of the wings also increases with increasing force production. The mean force coefficients were always greater than those expected under steady-state conditions under a variety of assumptions, verifying that force production in Drosophila spp. must involve non-steady-state mechanisms. The subtle changes in kinematics and force production within individual flight sequences demonstrate that flies possess a flexible control system for flight maneuvers in which they can independently control the stroke amplitude, stroke frequency and force coefficient of their wings. By studying four different-sized species, we examined the effects of absolute body size on the production and control of aerodynamic forces. With decreasing body size, the mean angular wing velocity that is required to support the body weight increases. This change is due almost entirely to an increase in stroke frequency, whereas mean stroke amplitude was similar in all four species. Despite the elevated stroke frequency and angular wing velocity, the translational velocity of the wings in small flies decreases with the reduction in absolute wing length. To compensate for their small size, D. nikananu must use higher mean force coefficients than their larger relatives.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 9427672     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.201.3.385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  20 in total

Review 1.  The development and evolution of crossveins in insect wings.

Authors:  J M Marcus
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 2.  The mechanisms of lift enhancement in insect flight.

Authors:  Fritz-Olaf Lehmann
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2004-03-04

3.  Insect-like flapping wing mechanism based on a double spherical Scotch yoke.

Authors:  Cezary Galiński; Rafał Zbikowski
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2005-06-22       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Controlling roll perturbations in fruit flies.

Authors:  Tsevi Beatus; John M Guckenheimer; Itai Cohen
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Flies compensate for unilateral wing damage through modular adjustments of wing and body kinematics.

Authors:  Florian T Muijres; Nicole A Iwasaki; Michael J Elzinga; Johan M Melis; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.906

6.  Flying in reverse: kinematics and aerodynamics of a dragonfly in backward free flight.

Authors:  Ayodeji T Bode-Oke; Samane Zeyghami; Haibo Dong
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Haltere-mediated equilibrium reflexes of the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M H Dickinson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1999-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Intrinsic disorder and multiple phosphorylations constrain the evolution of the flightin N-terminal region.

Authors:  Dominick Lemas; Panagiotis Lekkas; Bryan A Ballif; Jim O Vigoreaux
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 4.044

9.  Calcium signalling indicates bilateral power balancing in the Drosophila flight muscle during manoeuvring flight.

Authors:  Fritz-Olaf Lehmann; Dimitri A Skandalis; Ruben Berthé
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  The effects of age and behavioral development on honey bee (Apis mellifera) flight performance.

Authors:  Jason T Vance; Jason B Williams; Michelle M Elekonich; Stephen P Roberts
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.