Literature DB >> 15671333

Dynamic flight stability of a hovering bumblebee.

Mao Sun1, Yan Xiong.   

Abstract

The longitudinal dynamic flight stability of a hovering bumblebee was studied using the method of computational fluid dynamics to compute the aerodynamic derivatives and the techniques of eigenvalue and eigenvector analysis for solving the equations of motion. For the longitudinal disturbed motion, three natural modes were identified: one unstable oscillatory mode, one stable fast subsidence mode and one stable slow subsidence mode. The unstable oscillatory mode consists of pitching and horizontal moving oscillations with negligible vertical motion. The period of the oscillations is 0.32 s (approx. 50 times the wingbeat period of the bumblebee). The oscillations double in amplitude in 0.1 s; coupling of nose-up pitching with forward horizontal motion (and nose-down pitching with backward horizontal motion) in this mode causes the instability. The stable fast subsidence mode consists of monotonic pitching and horizontal motions, which decay to half of the starting values in 0.024 s. The stable slow subsidence mode is mainly a monotonic descending (or ascending) motion, which decays to half of its starting value in 0.37 s. Due to the unstable oscillatory mode, the hovering flight of the bumblebee is dynamically unstable. However, the instability might not be a great problem to a bumblebee that tries to stay hovering: the time for the initial disturbances to double (0.1 s) is more than 15 times the wingbeat period (6.4 ms), and the bumblebee has plenty of time to adjust its wing motion before the disturbances grow large.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15671333     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.01407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  27 in total

1.  Floquet stability analysis of the longitudinal dynamics of two hovering model insects.

Authors:  Jiang Hao Wu; Mao Sun
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Nonlinear flight dynamics and stability of hovering model insects.

Authors:  Bin Liang; Mao Sun
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Cost of flight and the evolution of stag beetle weaponry.

Authors:  Jana Goyens; Sam Van Wassenbergh; Joris Dirckx; Peter Aerts
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Controlling roll perturbations in fruit flies.

Authors:  Tsevi Beatus; John M Guckenheimer; Itai Cohen
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Chordwise wing flexibility may passively stabilize hovering insects.

Authors:  James E Bluman; Madhu K Sridhar; Chang-Kwon Kang
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 6.  Aerodynamics, sensing and control of insect-scale flapping-wing flight.

Authors:  Wei Shyy; Chang-Kwon Kang; Pakpong Chirarattananon; Sridhar Ravi; Hao Liu
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.704

7.  Indirect actuation reduces flight power requirements in Manduca sexta via elastic energy exchange.

Authors:  Jeff Gau; Nick Gravish; Simon Sponberg
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Predicting fruit fly's sensing rate with insect flight simulations.

Authors:  Song Chang; Z Jane Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Dynamic structure of locomotor behavior in walking fruit flies.

Authors:  Alexander Y Katsov; Limor Freifeld; Mark Horowitz; Seppe Kuehn; Thomas R Clandinin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Turbulence-driven instabilities limit insect flight performance.

Authors:  Stacey A Combes; Robert Dudley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.