Literature DB >> 16846419

Tricuspid insufficiency does not increase early after permanent implantation of pacemaker leads.

Nezihi Kucukarslan1, Ata Kirilmaz, Eralp Ulusoy, Mehmet Yokusoglu, Nikola Gramatnikovski, Ertugrul Ozal, Harun Tatar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Interference between pacemaker (PM) lead and tricuspid apparatus may cause tricuspid regurgitation (TR). However, data regarding TR in patients with implanted PM are controversial. Our aim is to find out the degree of TR in a group of patients before and following PM implantation in a prospective manner.
METHODS: The study group consisted of the patients referred for implantation of permanent PM or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). All patients underwent two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiographic evaluation before and after device implantation. The severity of TR was qualitatively classified into four groups as normal or trivial, mild, moderate, or severe. All studies were reviewed for accuracy by a second independent interpreter.
RESULTS: Sixty-one patients (mean age 53 +/- 8 years, 44 male) referred for PM (n = 55) or ICD (n = 6) implantation consisted of the study population. Echocardiographic degree of TR was mild in 21 (70%), moderate in 7 (23%) and severe in 2 (7%) patients before PM implantation. Following device implantation, mild TR was noted in 23 (76%), moderate in 10 (33%), and severe in 2 (6%) cases. After the procedure, the TR severity was increased from normal/trivial to mild in 5 (16%) cases and from mild to moderate in 3 (10%). There was no worsening of the severity of TR in patients with moderate regurgitation following device implantation. The severity of TR did not change at a mean follow-up of 6 +/- 3 months.
CONCLUSIONS: New or worsening TR is relatively rare after PM implantation. It is not associated with an acute worsening or clinical deterioration. But echocardiographic follow-up is recommended to monitor other complications in chronic phase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16846419     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2006.00251.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Card Surg        ISSN: 0886-0440            Impact factor:   1.620


  14 in total

1.  Clinical significance of increased tricuspid valve incompetence following implantation of ventricular leads.

Authors:  Giselle A Baquero; Pradeep Yadav; Joshua B Skibba; Javier E Banchs; Latoya N Linton-Frazier; Eugene J Lengerich; Soraya M Samii; Erica Penny-Peterson; Deborah L Wolbrette; Jerry C Luck; Gerald V Naccarelli; Mario D Gonzalez
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 2.  Tricuspid valve incompetence following implantation of ventricular leads.

Authors:  Giselle A Baquero; Jerry Luck; Gerald V Naccarelli; Mario D Gonzalez; Javier E Banchs
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2015-04

3.  The mechanism of endocardial lead-induced tricuspid regurgitation.

Authors:  Espeed Khoshbin; Abdelrahman Abdelbar; Stuart Allen; Ragheb Hasan
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-04-09

4.  Impact of implantable transvenous device lead location on severity of tricuspid regurgitation.

Authors:  Karima Addetia; Francesco Maffessanti; Anuj Mediratta; Megan Yamat; Lynn Weinert; Joshua D Moss; Hemal M Nayak; Martin C Burke; Amit R Patel; Eric Kruse; Valluvan Jeevanandam; Victor Mor-Avi; Roberto M Lang
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 5.251

5.  Pacemaker-induced tricuspid regurgitation is uncommon immediately post-implantation.

Authors:  Daniel P Rothschild; James A Goldstein; Nathan Kerner; Amr E Abbas; Meet Patel; Wai Shun Wong
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Tricuspid Regurgitation and Mortality in Patients With Transvenous Permanent Pacemaker Leads.

Authors:  Francesca N Delling; Zena K Hassan; Gail Piatkowski; Connie W Tsao; Alefiyah Rajabali; Lawrence J Markson; Peter J Zimetbaum; Warren J Manning; James D Chang; Kenneth J Mukamal
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 7.  Tricuspid regurgitation following implantation of a pacemaker/cardioverter-defibrillator.

Authors:  Maha A Al-Mohaissen; Kwan Leung Chan
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Tricuspid valve regurgitation following temporary or permanent endocardial lead insertion, and the impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Masoud Sadreddini; Michelle J Haroun; Lisanne Buikema; Carlos Morillo; Sebastian Ribas; Syamkumar Divakaramenon; Stuart J Connolly; Robby Nieuwlaat; Eva M Lonn; Jeff S Healey; Hisham Dokainish
Journal:  Open Cardiovasc Med J       Date:  2014-12-31

9.  Tricuspid valve surgery in implantable cardiac electronic device-related endocarditis: Repair or replace?

Authors:  Mehmet Çakıcı; Evren Özçınar; Çağdaş Baran; Fatih Gümüş; Mustafa Serkan Durdu; Mustafa Bahadır İnan; Sadık Eryılmaz; Ahmet Rüçhan Akar
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 0.332

10.  Prospective study of tricuspid valve regurgitation associated with permanent leads in patients undergoing cardiac rhythm device implantation: Background, rationale, and design.

Authors:  Hisham Dokainish; Esam Elbarasi; Simona Masiero; Caroline Van de Heyning; Michela Brambatti; Sami Ghazal; Said Al-Maashani; Alessandro Capucci; Lisanne Buikema; Darryl Leong; Bharati Shivalkar; Johan Saenen; Hielko Miljoen; Carlos Morillo; Syam Divarakarmenon; Guy Amit; Sebastian Ribas; Aaron Brautigam; Erika Baiocco; Alessandro Maolo; Andrea Romandini; Simone Maffei; Stuart Connolly; Jeff Healey
Journal:  Glob Cardiol Sci Pract       Date:  2015-10-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.