Literature DB >> 26833208

Tricuspid Regurgitation and Mortality in Patients With Transvenous Permanent Pacemaker Leads.

Francesca N Delling1, Zena K Hassan2, Gail Piatkowski3, Connie W Tsao4, Alefiyah Rajabali4, Lawrence J Markson5, Peter J Zimetbaum4, Warren J Manning6, James D Chang4, Kenneth J Mukamal7.   

Abstract

Estimates of the prevalence and importance of significant tricuspid regurgitation (STR) related to implantable device leads are based mainly on case reports, small observational studies, or mixed samples that include defibrillators. We sought to assess whether patients with permanent pacemaker (PPM) leads have an increased risk of STR and to determine mortality associated with PPM-related TR in a large longitudinal single-center cohort. We examined the prevalence of STR (defined as moderate-severe or ≥3+) among all echocardiograms performed from 2005 to 2011 excluding those with defibrillators. We then examined mortality risk according to the prevalence of PPM and STR after adjusting for cardiac co-morbidities, left ventricular systolic/diastolic function, and pulmonary artery hypertension. We screened 93,592 echocardiograms (1,245 with PPM) in 58,556 individual patients (634 with PPM). The prevalence of STR was higher in patients after PPM placement (mean age 79 ± 3 years; 54% men) compared with those without a PPM (adjusted odds ratio 2.32; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.54 to 3.49; p <0.0001). Among patients with a PPM lead, the presence of STR was associated with increased mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1.40; 95% CI 1.04 to 2.11, p = 0.027, vs no STR). Compared with having neither a PPM lead nor STR, adjusted hazard ratios for death were 2.13 (95% CI 1.93 to 2.34) for STR but no PPM, 1.04 (0.89 to 1.22) for PPM without STR, and 1.55 (1.13 to 2.14) for PPM with STR. In conclusion, in a sample comprising >58,000 individual patients, PPM leads are associated with higher risk of STR after adjustment for left ventricular systolic/diastolic function and pulmonary artery hypertension; similarly to STR from other cardiac pathologies, PPM-related STR is associated with increased mortality.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26833208      PMCID: PMC4775321          DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.12.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  17 in total

1.  Transvenous pacemaker leads do not worsen tricuspid regurgitation: a prospective echocardiographic study.

Authors:  D W Leibowitz; S Rosenheck; A Pollak; M Geist; D Gilon
Journal:  Cardiology       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.869

Review 2.  Tricuspid valve malfunction and ventricular pacemaker lead: case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Said B Iskandar; S Ann Jackson; Stephen Fahrig; Bassam K Mechleb; Israel D Garcia
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.724

3.  Permanent pacemaker implantation technique: part II.

Authors:  Kim Rajappan
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Increased prevalence of significant tricuspid regurgitation in patients with transvenous pacemakers leads.

Authors:  D Paniagua; H R Aldrich; E H Lieberman; G A Lamas; A S Agatston
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1998-11-01       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Detection and evaluation of tricuspid regurgitation using a real-time, two-dimensional, color-coded, Doppler flow imaging system: comparison with contrast two-dimensional echocardiography and right ventriculography.

Authors:  Y Suzuki; H Kambara; K Kadota; S Tamaki; A Yamazato; R Nohara; G Osakada; C Kawai
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1986-04-01       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Measuring diagnoses: ICD code accuracy.

Authors:  Kimberly J O'Malley; Karon F Cook; Matt D Price; Kimberly Raiford Wildes; John F Hurdle; Carol M Ashton
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Tricuspid insufficiency does not increase early after permanent implantation of pacemaker leads.

Authors:  Nezihi Kucukarslan; Ata Kirilmaz; Eralp Ulusoy; Mehmet Yokusoglu; Nikola Gramatnikovski; Ertugrul Ozal; Harun Tatar
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.620

8.  Impact of tricuspid regurgitation on long-term survival.

Authors:  Jayant Nath; Elyse Foster; Paul A Heidenreich
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-02-04       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  The effect of transvenous pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead placement on tricuspid valve function: an observational study.

Authors:  Juyong B Kim; Daniel M Spevack; Paul A Tunick; John R Bullinga; Itzhak Kronzon; Larry A Chinitz; Harmony R Reynolds
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2007-07-02       Impact factor: 5.251

10.  Tricuspid incompetence following permanent pacemaker implantation.

Authors:  Marc Klutstein; Jonathan Balkin; Adi Butnaru; Michael Ilan; Amnon Lahad; David Rosenmann
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.976

View more
  18 in total

1.  A Novel Defibrillation Tool: Percutaneously Delivered, Partially Insulated Epicardial Defibrillation.

Authors:  Ammar M Killu; Niyada Naksuk; Zdeněk Stárek; Christopher V DeSimone; Faisal F Syed; Prakriti Gaba; Jiří Wolf; Frantisek Lehar; Martin Pesl; Pavel Leinveber; Michal Crha; Dorothy Ladewig; Joanne Powers; Scott Suddendorf; David O Hodge; Gaurav Satam; Miroslav Novák; Tomas Kara; Charles J Bruce; Paul A Friedman; Samuel J Asirvatham
Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-07

2.  Single- and dual-site ventricular pacing entirely through the coronary sinus for patients with prior tricuspid valve surgery.

Authors:  Chin C Lee; Khuyen Do; Sati Patel; Steven K Carlson; Tomas Konecny; Philip M Chang; Rahul N Doshi
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 3.  Next-generation pacemakers: from small devices to biological pacemakers.

Authors:  Eugenio Cingolani; Joshua I Goldhaber; Eduardo Marbán
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  Comparison of Tricuspid Regurgitation Severity Between Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Authors:  James Livesay; Benjamin Fogelson; Hassan Tahir; Raj Baljepally
Journal:  Cardiol Res       Date:  2022-06-16

5.  The prognostic value of transesophageal echocardiography after transvenous lead extraction: landscape after battle.

Authors:  Dorota Nowosielecka; Wojciech Jacheć; Anna Polewczyk; Andrzej Kleinrok; Łukasz Tułecki; Andrzej Kutarski
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-04

6.  Pacemaker lead-associated tricuspid regurgitation in patients with or without pre-existing right ventricular dilatation.

Authors:  Martin Riesenhuber; Andreas Spannbauer; Marianne Gwechenberger; Thomas Pezawas; Christoph Schukro; Günter Stix; Matthias Schneider; Georg Goliasch; Anahit Anvari; Thomas Wrba; Cesar Khazen; Martin Andreas; Günther Laufer; Christian Hengstenberg; Mariann Gyongyosi
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 5.460

7.  Prevalence, predictors, and prognosis of tricuspid regurgitation following permanent pacemaker implantation.

Authors:  Jiwon Seo; Dae-Young Kim; Iksung Cho; Geu-Ru Hong; Jong-Won Ha; Chi Young Shim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Endocardial transvenous pacing in patients with surgically palliated univentricular hearts: A review on different techniques, problems and management.

Authors:  Koneru Lakshmi Umamaheshwar; Arvind Sahadev Singh; Kothandam Sivakumar
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2018-11-30

9.  Multi-site multi-polar left ventricular pacing through persistent left superior vena cava in tricuspid valve disease.

Authors:  Ernest W Lau
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2017-05-30

Review 10.  State of the art: leadless ventricular pacing : A national expert consensus of the Austrian Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  C Steinwender; P Lercher; C Schukro; H Blessberger; G Prenner; M Andreas; J Kraus; M Ammer; M Stühlinger
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 1.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.